Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
To be honest, I think environments that work like that won't use Fedora
anyway if it wasn't supported for at least three, let's say two and a
half, years.
Having to agree with your
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
Worth mentioning— .30 makes a non-backwards-compatible BTRFS format change.
So if you go .30 on a BTRFS system you can't go back.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Gregory Maxwellgmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
Worth mentioning— .30 makes a non-backwards-compatible
On 05/07/09 07:20, Matej Cepl wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
snip
The problem I have with this whole project is that nobody explained me
well, why you folks interested in this don't join CentOS project? NIH?
Matěj
Possibly because CentOS is not Fedora.
CCing #fedora-kernel-list
On 04.07.2009 16:12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Now that .1 is out, is there anything in particular stopping F-11 from
having this kernel?
And why is F10 still stuck on 2.6.27? 2.6.29 has been in updates-testing for
ages now.
Good question. Seems the
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 06:20:38 + (UTC), Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen, Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:30:46 +0200:
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:13:14 +0200, Julian Aloofi
To be honest, I think environments that work like that won't use Fedora
anyway if it wasn't supported for at
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
turns out to be. This disqualifies the distribution(s) as desktop Linux
On 07/05/2009 12:12 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
turns out to be. This disqualifies the
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
turns out to be. This disqualifies the distribution(s) as desktop Linux
Compose started at Sun Jul 5 06:15:06 UTC 2009
New package oflb-notcouriersans-fonts
NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono
Updated Packages:
abiword-2.7.6-2.fc12
* Sun Jul 05 2009 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com - 1:2.7.6-1
- New upstream release
I have rpms for older versions of vpython and a tutorial on how to make
rpms. Here is some information that might be
useful(http://rpmbuildtut.wordpress.com/). Let me know if you need any help.
Brad Longo
North Carolina State University
Aerospace Engineering/Applied Mathematics
Raleigh, NC
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 10:01:48PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Although I do believe that there's a small number of rpms whose spec
script does that, I really think that this is not correct, and the
packaging guidelines should really prohibit that. If the configure script
needs patching,
On Sun July 5 2009, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
There's been lots of previous discussion of this silly idea of
patching generated code. You end up carrying enormous patches
containing just line number changes that often can't be applied
upstream, and can't be carried forward to new upstream
Richard W.M. Jones writes:
There's been lots of previous discussion of this silly idea of
patching generated code. You end up carrying enormous patches
containing just line number changes that often can't be applied
upstream, and can't be carried forward to new upstream releases --
What line
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:39 AM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of
approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Jos Vosj...@xos.nl wrote:
I don't completely agree that desktops tend to need to run the latest and
greatest (when we're talking about business desktops), but desktops
I don't agree with that position either - note my work laptop, which
unfortunately runs
On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:39:44 +0100, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:03 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of
approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what
it
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwenkana...@kanarip.com wrote:
The CentOS project, or it's upstream, has a release cycle of approximately
three years -not a steady release cycle of three years but that's what it
turns out to be. This disqualifies the distribution(s) as desktop
I bought a new shiny red 500 GB USB HDD recently in order to back up
large files (mostly video but other stuff as well). My previous HDDs I
formatted as fat32 since that can be read and written by most devices
(PS3, Windows, Mac etc). Since I would only use this new HDD with my
different computers
Conrad Meyer writes:
On Sunday 05 July 2009 07:45:46 am Sam Varshavchik wrote:
*snip*
With a subsequent release, you'll still
have to rebase your existing patch, if the new release did not fix the
original bug. As I understand, rpm's default settings now reject fuzz in
patch files, so you'll
Maybe I should clarify my use case experience. After I used GParted to
format the HDD to ext3 (and ext4 later) I tried to create a folder on
the HDD. I could not do this as a normal user, only as root. When I
formatted the HDD to ntfs I could create folders and files. I want the
ntfs behavior.
--
Maybe I should clarify my use case experience. After I used GParted to
format the HDD to ext3 (and ext4 later) I tried to create a folder on
the HDD. I could not do this as a normal user, only as root.
You can create files/folders with users if they « own » the HDD. But
then, another user
Andreas Tunek writes:
Maybe I should clarify my use case experience. After I used GParted to
format the HDD to ext3 (and ext4 later) I tried to create a folder on
the HDD. I could not do this as a normal user, only as root. When I
formatted the HDD to ntfs I could create folders and files. I
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Create a top-level folder on the USB drive that's owned by
your userid,
then you can create any subfolders that your heart desires.
This works for me. I formatted the hard disk as ext4 and made a
few directories, then changed ownership to me, and now I can
modify the
Create a top-level folder on the USB drive that's owned by your userid, then
you can create any subfolders that your heart desires.
This is totally broken if the disk is used on multiple computers.
Having to maintain same UID-username combinations on the different
computers is just not good
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:21:58AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
kernel-2.6.31-0.42.rc2.fc12
---
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com
- 2.6.31-rc1-git11
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Dave Jones da...@redhat.com 2.6.31-0.42.rc2
- 2.6.31-rc2
* Fri Jul 03
Richard W.M. Jones writes:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:45:46AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
What line number changes? You cut a patch against configure, and you're
done. That's it.
And you get a big patch containing line numbers. Here's a single line
change to configure.ac, and the
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
It sure was a fabulous debut as a maintainer for Andreas (according
to changelog he took over from Jakub).
Hey, we all make mistakes, it's no use insulting people over it! Was that
sarcastic remark really necessary?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Richard W.M. Jones writes:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:24:43PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
For this kind of scope, rebuilding the entire configure
script is overkill, and I wouldn't do it unless I audit it and verify
whether or not upstream is relying on some specific behavior in the
Conrad Meyer wrote:
Unrelated, but I think this sort of phobia of regenerating an
auto-generated script just goes to show how completely broken autotools
is.
+1, auto-generated source code is an oxymoron, this design is really
broken.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Matej Cepl wrote:
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
I agree, who needs grep after all :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194471
/kidding
That package WORKS with UTF-8, it's just very slow with it on some extreme
Matej Cepl wrote:
Ralf Corsepius, Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:29:46 +0200:
I thought, we banned all non-utf-8 aware packages?
And BTW zsh has been fixed not to corrupt non-ASCII filenames?
Bash FTW! :-p
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Hi,
And you'll be violating the GPL (unless you're talking about a
BSD-style-licensed software or configure.ac is explicitly marked
with special permissions). The GPL requires you to edit the
preferred form for modification, which is definitely NOT a
generated file.
[citation
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 22:13 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/7/4 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com:
I wanted to draw your attention to a feature I've proposed for Fedora 12,
mysteriously called Extended Life Cycle.
You can find more details at
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 06:46:36PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:21:58AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
kernel-2.6.31-0.42.rc2.fc12
---
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com
- 2.6.31-rc1-git11
* Sat Jul 04 2009 Dave Jones
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[cut]
Patching the configure
script is much safer than patching configure.ac, then have autoconf grok all
.m4 macros and rebuild the whole thing, likely ending up with a completely
different beast, that not only
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
But that's what /you/ want to do, not me. Me, I'll just apply a patch to
the configure script, directly.
And you'll be violating the GPL (unless you're talking about a
BSD-style-licensed software or configure.ac is explicitly marked with
special
Hello,
So I've been toying with the idea of getting more involved with
fedora. Up till now if there has been a bug or other issue, i'll file
a bug or simply get the srpm and try to update it to a newer version,
or create my own specs / rpms when they don't already exist. Lately
I've
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil writes:
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
[cut]
Patching the configure
script is much safer than patching configure.ac, then have autoconf grok
all
.m4 macros and rebuild the whole thing, likely
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
Hello,
So I've been toying with the idea of getting more involved with
fedora. Up till now if there has been a bug or other issue, i'll file
a bug or simply get the srpm and try to update it to a newer version,
or create my own specs / rpms when they don't
2009/7/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
It sure was a fabulous debut as a maintainer for Andreas (according
to changelog he took over from Jakub).
Hey, we all make mistakes, it's no use insulting people over it! Was that
sarcastic remark really necessary?
Sorry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504256
Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
42 matches
Mail list logo
