Re: prelink: is it worth it?

2009-07-10 Thread Ron Yorston
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: Also, while prelink process has been fairly expensive some years ago, it is much faster these days; if you haven't installed any rpms in the last day, most of the days the cron job will just quit, if you have installed some, for libraries/binaries that don't

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

2009-07-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:08:49AM +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: Also, while prelink process has been fairly expensive some years ago, it is much faster these days; if you haven't installed any rpms in the last day, most of the days the cron job will just

non-blocking dbus server

2009-07-10 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
Hi, in our project ABRT we use DBUS for communication between ABRT daemon and client (gui), the problem is that when I ask daemon to do some time-consuming work the server is blocked until the work is done. So I want to use threads and that's where I found the catch. Here is my idea: 1.

Re: poll(), gdb, threads, alsa-lib, deadlock

2009-07-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:49:04 +0200, Dominik wrote: AFAIR I got the problem right from the beginning of using F10, but I installed it about a month or two after it came out and updated immediately after installation. Here's somebody who gets audacious, totem, mplayer etc. to lock up with

Oh to have USB/CD write and sound...

2009-07-10 Thread Paul
Hi, As you're all aware on here, I've been using Rawhide for many many many moons now, I accept the risks, I accept the bleeding edge and that my fingers may get burned from time to time. However, it's been quite a while now (I think it broke shortly after the rawhide repos opened post the

Re: Man pages need love from native speakers!

2009-07-10 Thread Guido Grazioli
Hello, i'd be glad to help you with the -it package Guido 2009/7/10 Ding-Yi Chen dc...@redhat.com Currently I maintain man-pages-es, man-pages-it, and man-pages-ko. In terms of package maintenance, they are easy and requires low maintenance effort. These packages are also good for a novice

Re: noarch subpackages

2009-07-10 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:10:09 +0200, yersinia wrote: %if 0%{?fedora} 9 BuildArch: noarch %endif Excellent. That's what I was looking for. No, it is not right for me. The BuildArch issue depends on the RPM version and not from from distro version. It is simply bad style, IMHO,

F11 updates?

2009-07-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, Is there an issue with F11 updates, I don't remember seeing anything on the list about it but AFAICT it seems there's not been an updates push for around 2 weeks. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com

Re: F11 updates?

2009-07-10 Thread John5342
2009/7/10 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com: Hi All, Is there an issue with F11 updates, I don't remember seeing anything on the list about it but AFAICT it seems there's not been an updates push for around 2 weeks. Last updates i saw where 3rd and 4th July which is a while ago but hardly

Re: F11 updates?

2009-07-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi All, Is there an issue with F11 updates, I don't remember seeing anything on the list about it but AFAICT it seems there's not been an updates push for around 2 weeks. Last updates i saw where 3rd and 4th July which is a while ago but hardly 2 weeks. Other than that i would say they

Re: F11 updates?

2009-07-10 Thread Peter Robinson
Is there an issue with F11 updates, I don't remember seeing anything on the list about it but AFAICT it seems there's not been an updates push for around 2 weeks. You often can find a status on: http://identi.ca/jwboyer @jwb: thx for that service btw How useful, thanks :-) Peter --

Re: non-blocking dbus server

2009-07-10 Thread Mat Booth
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jiri Moskovcakjmosk...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, in our project ABRT we use DBUS for communication between ABRT daemon and client (gui), the problem is that when I ask daemon to do some time-consuming work the server is blocked until the work is done. So I want

New parted release update.

2009-07-10 Thread Joel Granados
Hello list. I posted a mail some weeks ago about new parted version in fedora. As some of you might have noticed i have been to lazy to put it in :). But after a few adjustments and a little bit of actual work, I think I have gotten to a point where I am satisfied. Packages that might need

Re: Possible packages...

2009-07-10 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Jul 10, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:22:20 Jarod Wilson wrote: On Thursday 09 July 2009 17:15:47 Jarod Wilson wrote: Stuff in Fedora, but simply not used for whatever reason: -vobject (we have python-vobject) -pyflakes I thought they were used if

Re: art of packaging: fluxbox-pulseaudio

2009-07-10 Thread Mike Bonnet
On 07/08/2009 02:55 PM, Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:50:18 -0700 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 20:44 +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote: It is not only an empty file. It requires the necessary PA packages and triggers automatic PA loading on

Next Fit and Finish test day: Batteries and Suspend

2009-07-10 Thread Matthias Clasen
Time to announce the next 'fit and finish' test day. On July 21, we want to look at issues with the user experience around batteries, suspend and power management in general. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-07-21_Fit_and_Finish:Batteries_and_Suspend Please join us in

Re: non-blocking dbus server

2009-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Jiri Moskovcakjmosk...@redhat.com wrote: 3. when the work is finished send reply to the client - this is the part where I'm stuck, because I want to send the reply as return message to the matching method call, but the method call already returned when I

Re: noarch subpackages

2009-07-10 Thread Rick L Vinyard Jr
yersinia wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu mailto:rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu wrote: Jussi Lehtola wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:28 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote: Except it should be: %if 0%{?fedora} 9 || 0%{?rhel} 5

rawhide report: 20090710 changes

2009-07-10 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jul 10 06:15:06 UTC 2009 New package armadillo Fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS New package elfelli Visualisation tool for flux lines New package libqinfinity Qt interface for libinfinity New package

Re: non-blocking dbus server

2009-07-10 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 07/10/2009 05:18 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: Hi, in our project ABRT we use DBUS for communication between ABRT daemon and client (gui), the problem is that when I ask daemon to do some time-consuming work the server is blocked until the work is done. So I want to use threads and that's

FESCo meeting summary for 2009-07-10

2009-07-10 Thread Jon Stanley
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.html Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-10/fedora-meeting.2009-07-10-17.00.log.html Log below as well 17:00:44 jds2001 #startmeeting FESCo meeting 2009-07-10

Packages tracked by FEver that need to be updated

2009-07-10 Thread Till Maas
Aloas, some of you added your packages to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_FEver_to_track_upstream_changes Unfortunately seems the original author of fever not to be around anymore, e.g. his fedorapeople account is removed/backed-up. Therefore I started to write a new framework to replace

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

2009-07-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:29:43PM +0200, yersinia wrote: Ok. But prelink it or not a requisite for ASLR or not ? In other word, besides performance is disabling prelink a security matter or not ? It is not bad to have some answer on this. ASLR happens with prelink or without. Particularly,

Re: prelink: is it worth it?

2009-07-10 Thread yersinia
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:29:43PM +0200, yersinia wrote: Ok. But prelink it or not a requisite for ASLR or not ? In other word, besides performance is disabling prelink a security matter or not ? It is not bad to have

Re: x86_64 packages depends on i586.

2009-07-10 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits? mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 needs glibc.i686 libdrm.i586

rpms/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-07-10 Thread ron
Author: ron Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26950/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.spec Log Message: Auto import of perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.

rpms/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-07-10 Thread ron
Author: ron Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31898/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.spec Log Message: Auto import of perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert. ---