Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 00:30 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit :
when do you want the bitmap format conversion to happen? the sooner
the better or convert them all together at some point?
I don't think Fedora will want to do the conversion unilaterally. So
that leaves out single-day conversion.
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 08:10 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
I don't think Fedora will want to do the conversion unilaterally. So
that leaves out single-day conversion. It will take a long time to reach
all the upstreams we package PCF fonts from,
Though on reflection the audit script
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts IIIti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
BM == Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com writes:
BM Has anybody looked at packaging JOSM, et. al in Fedora?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
Feel free to help review it.
I also found
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this
Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features:
- XZ RPM Payloads
- x86 Architecture Support
I'm a bit aware of quite recent change in FORTIFY_SOURCES - which added
some
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:35AM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this
Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features:
- XZ RPM Payloads
- x86 Architecture Support
I'm a bit aware
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:11:32PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
List of deps left behind by orphan removal:
bes, dap-*_handler and dap-server are associated and should either all
be owned or none.
Orphan: libdap
Orphan: libnc-dap
Somebody has to take those, they are a dependency of many
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:35AM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Fedora Release Enginerering is going to be starting a mass rebuild this
Thursday, July 28th, for the following Fedora 12 features:
- XZ RPM Payloads
- x86 Architecture
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:43:02AM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
It shouldn't be an error, this warning (rarely) has false positives and
warns even about code that is never executed. That doesn't mean we
shouldn't be grepping build logs for those warnings and letting maintainers
know that
Jesse Keating, Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:11:32 -0700:
Orphan: qt-qsa
LabPlot requires qt-qsa-devel = 1.1.5-6.fc11 LabPlot requires
libqsa.so.1
I am not Qt user, but isn't qt-qsa the only how to get SSL/TLS for many
(all?) Qt projects? (I know I had to install it for kopete and psi to
have
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:13:07AM +, Matej Cepl wrote:
Orphan: qt-qsa
I am not Qt user, but isn't qt-qsa the only how to get SSL/TLS for many
(all?) Qt projects?
Yes and no.
qt-qsa is the 'old' variant. The package containing the current code is
qca2 and that is still maintained.
--
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:10:58PM +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
I'd really like to join in with this having experienced issues with
suspend/resume with:
* Dell Inspiron 9300 (using nvidia driver as nouveau/nv don't support
suspend/resume)
* Dell Studion XPS 16 (using either radeon or
Hey,
I've committed this patch to Fedora 12, which removes the requirement
for ImageMagick, and uses gdk-pixbuf for image manipulation instead:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472103#c0
I'd appreciate if owners of AES4000 fingerprint readers could test and
report problems with the
I'd like to create an RPM (spec file) to package my Perl based product so that
its easy to distribute and easy to add to a Fedora kickstart file, but
I'm not too sure
where to start. I've looked around and found cpan2rpm and rpmpan, but I'd
like to know what the 'official' approach is for Fedora.
Fulko Hew on 07/21/2009 08:29 AM wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl ?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Tuesday, July 21 2009, Matthias Clasen said:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 13:10 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
It would be great if the test day (and others) could link to a iso for
rawhide that fits on a CD to make this part of the process simple.
hint, hint ;-]
Yeah, I'm working on it.
Compose started at Tue Jul 21 06:15:03 UTC 2009
New package ghc-editline
Haskell %{pgk_name} library
New package gnome-do-plugins
Plugins for GNOME Do
New package perl-Algorithm-IncludeExclude
Build and evaluate include/exclude lists
New package quitcount
A tool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I have a package with a xemacs lisp file which refer to lpr-command.
If I try to compile this file, I will get an error message that the
symbol's value may be void.
So I want to ask for the best practice to fix this issue.
Best Regards:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:46:20 -0400,
Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:10:58PM +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
I'd really like to join in with this having experienced issues with
suspend/resume with:
* Dell Inspiron 9300 (using nvidia driver as
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
[snip]
Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2
gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
gnome-chemistry-utils-mozplugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
Sven Lankes, Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:42:07 +0200:
qt-qsa is the 'old' variant. The package containing the current code is
qca2 and that is still maintained.
Cool. I suspected I am out-of-date.
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:29:46 -0400,
Fulko Hew fulko@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to create an RPM (spec file) to package my Perl based product so that
its easy to distribute and easy to add to a Fedora kickstart file, but
I'm not too sure
where to start. I've looked around and found
Hi... anyone out there could help with the bugzilla bug 505421?? Filed
on 2009-06-11, no answers of substance yet and no workaround suggested.
Should be easy, a module is not being loaded on demand, it was before.
I keep getting questions about this on the Planet CCRMA list, it makes
midi
Dave Airlie wrote:
just apply the --unsafe as default patch I suppose, I'm not sure its
actually a useful feature,
I created an 'unsafe' mode by default patch and sent it upstream, as
well as noted it in the bug report. I'll go apply for privileges to
asciidoc so I can apply this, if no one
Am Donnerstag, 28 Mai 2009 13:06:43 schrieb Simon Wesp:
SW I created a review with the FE-LEGAL blocker, because I didn't see this
SW email.
Lifted FE-Legal!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell
Simon Wesp
The G in GNU stands for
On 07/21/2009 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
[snip]
Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2
gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
gnome-chemistry-utils-mozplugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin
On Tuesday 21 July 2009, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Hallo,
I have a package with a xemacs lisp file which refer to lpr-command.
If I try to compile this file, I will get an error message that the
symbol's value may be void.
As far as I can tell, lpr-command is a customizable variable defined in
Jesse Keating wrote:
List of deps left behind by orphan removal:
Orphan: jline
lucene requires jline = 0.9.94-0.3.fc11
...which is required by OpenOffice.org. That's going to be a problem...
except that F11 lucene doesn't need jline.
Orphan: libatomic_ops
pulseaudio requires
Fighting against in-buildroot-or-not? dependencies ;-)
I have three packages,
cld depends: none
chunkd depends: cld
tabled depends: cld chunkd
1) I updated all three packages in cvs devel (rawhide), and tagged them.
2) 'make build' on cld
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
How to fix this paradox?
Just bump the release, recommit and retag.
--
Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org
Why, a four-year-old could understand this report.
Find me a four-year-old child.
I can't make head or tail out of it. --
I was successful building boost 1.39.0 from rawhide source RPM (using
boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm) for RHEL 5.3. Now, I need to compile the same
package on a Fedora 11 server but I am getting some build error in the
process:
# rpm -ivh boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm
# cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS
#
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 02:16:07 pm Ian Weller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
How to fix this paradox?
Just bump the release, recommit and retag.
ummm no
you need to wait for a new repo you can do a koji wait repo then your chain
build for the
On 2009-07-21 09:25:57 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You, no bugs appear even though there should be one in
progress. It seems that the query generating
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:13:15 -0400, Jeff wrote:
Fighting against in-buildroot-or-not? dependencies ;-)
I have three packages,
cld depends: none
chunkd depends: cld
tabled depends: cld chunkd
1) I updated all three packages in cvs devel
On 07/21/2009 09:34 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-21 09:25:57 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You, no bugs appear even though there should be one in
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:31 -0400, Martin Dubuc wrote:
I was successful building boost 1.39.0 from rawhide source RPM (using
boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm) for RHEL 5.3. Now, I need to compile the
same package on a Fedora 11 server but I am getting some build error
in the process:
# rpm -ivh
2009/7/21 Edwin ten Brink ed...@tenbrink-bekkers.nl:
On 07/21/2009 09:34 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-21 09:25:57 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You,
On 2009-07-21 10:11:34 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
On 07/21/2009 09:34 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-21 09:25:57 PM, Edwin ten Brink wrote:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You,
Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 21:25 +0200 schrieb Edwin ten Brink:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You, no bugs appear even though there should be one in
progress. It seems that the
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 14:19 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 19 July 2009 02:05:44 pm Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Sorry to bother the -devel list with this, but nobody on fedora-list
responded to my question, and I know there is some effort to package
Sage for Fedora. I hope one of those
On 7/21/09 1:35 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 07/21/2009 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:11 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
[snip]
Orphan: pcmanx-gtk2
gnash-plugin requires /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
gnome-chemistry-utils-mozplugin requires
On 07/21/2009 02:48 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:11:32PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
List of deps left behind by orphan removal:
bes, dap-*_handler and dap-server are associated and should either all
be owned or none.
Orphan: libdap
Orphan: libnc-dap
Somebody has to
I've done some updating to the no frozen rawhide proposal[1]. There is
still time to enact this for Fedora 12, which would take effect when we
reach Alpha freeze in a couple weeks. I'd like another round of people
reviewing it and giving feedback before we take it to FESCo. Thanks!
[1]:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:57:41PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'll take them all.
Thanks!
--
Pat
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Hi,
I have a few questions for the folks involved with the Critical Path
Packages proposal, as I'm still confused about the implementation details:
1. How will the policy be enforced? Will Bodhi withhold submitted updates
for packages in the depsolving hull of @critical-path until they get
Hi,
Thanks a lot.
Hedayat
On 07/20/2009 11:21 AM, � wrote:
Hi Hedayat Vatankhah
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508522
latex in rawhide is broken
Greetings
Josephine
2009/7/20 Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com mailto:heda...@grad.com
Hi all,
Recently, one of my
perl-AnyEvent has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
perl-AnyEvent-4.820-1.fc12.noarch requires perl(IO::Async::Loop)
perl-AnyEvent-4.820-1.fc12.noarch requires perl(IO::Async::Handle)
On x86_64:
perl-AnyEvent-4.820-1.fc12.noarch requires
46 matches
Mail list logo
