maven2 broken deps? (Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Alex Lancaster
Rawhide Report writes: [...] A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix it. Anybody know what's going on? Broken deps for i386 -- [...]

Re: maven2 broken deps? (Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
Rawhide Report writes: [...] A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix it. Anybody know what's going on? We are working on update of maven2 to not so ancient version. Progress can be tracked

How to resurrect a dead package?

2009-08-31 Thread Fabio M. Di Nitto
Hi guys, sorry, I recall this was discussed on the mailing list in the past, but I can't find the thread anymore. I need to resurrect rgmanager package in Fedora. fedora-cvs still has the package so it's only a matter of re-importing it into the devel/ branch. What are the right steps to take?

NetworkManager-based packages won't rebuild to fix broken deps (was Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Alex Lancaster
Rawhide Report writes: [...] A NetworkManger update has caused a number of new broken deps. Simple rebuilds for some of these NetworkManager-based apps are failing: Broken deps for i386 --

Re: maven2 broken deps? (Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Alex Lancaster
AK == Alexander Kurtakov writes: Rawhide Report writes: [...] A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix it. Anybody know what's going on? AK We are working on update of maven2 to not so

Re: NetworkManager-based packages won't rebuild to fix broken deps (was Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: Rawhide Report writes: Has something changed in the API/ABI? The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc - libnm_glib.pc, so pkg-config --exists libnm-glib instead of pkg-config --exists libnm_glib etc. No idea if this is an

Re: rpms/nss/devel nss.spec,1.105,1.106

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:44:40 -0700, Elio wrote: Problem should be fixed in nss-3.12.3.99.3-29.fc12. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129934 and comments in Bug 520277. Why do you add an explicit Requires: sqlite to package nss if that one isn't even linked with

Re: maven2 broken deps? (Re: rawhide report: 20090830 changes)

2009-08-31 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
AK == Alexander Kurtakov writes: Rawhide Report writes: [...] A whole slew of broken deps caused by a new maven2 have been sitting in rawhide for about the last week with no attempted rebuilds to fix it. Anybody know what's going on? AK We are working on update of maven2 to

Re: How to resurrect a dead package?

2009-08-31 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nittofdini...@redhat.com wrote: What are the right steps to take? I think: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages covers them. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna

Re: NetworkManager-based packages won't rebuild to fix broken deps

2009-08-31 Thread Alex Lancaster
CM == Caolán McNamara writes: CM On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 01:53 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: Rawhide Report writes: Has something changed in the API/ABI? CM The name of the .pc file itself, i.e. libnm-glib.pc - libnm_glib.pc, so CM pkg-config --exists libnm-glib instead of pkg-config --exists

Re: How to resurrect a dead package?

2009-08-31 Thread Fabio M. Di Nitto
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 11:48 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nittofdini...@redhat.com wrote: What are the right steps to take? I think: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages covers them. Looks like it.. thanks!

Re: PolicyKit 0.9 is going away

2009-08-31 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Saturday 29 August 2009 22:43:46 Kevin Kofler wrote: Matthias Clasen wrote: Anyway, this all seems to be a somewhat moot discussion, trying to nail us down on a 'promise to keep the old stuff around', when there already is a patch that can solve the whole dilemma. Looks like this is

rawhide report: 20090831 changes

2009-08-31 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Aug 31 06:15:05 UTC 2009 New package R-affy Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays New package python-werkzeug The Swiss Army knife of Python web development Updated Packages: NetworkManager-openconnect-0.7.996-1.git20090828.fc12

Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009

2009-08-31 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 -

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-31 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote: On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:16:33 +0200 Stefan Grosse singularit...@gmx.net wrote: SG dvipdfm-0.13.2d-40.fc11.i586 von installed hat SG Abhängigkeitsauflöse-Probleme -- Fehlende Abhängigkeit: SG libkpathsea.so.4 wird benötigt von

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-31 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 05:14:33PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: Package texlive-dvips is obsoleted by texlive, trying to install texlive-2009-0.3.20090827.fc11.i586 instead This is obviously wrong obsolete, as dvips is actually provided by texlive-dvips, but for some reason unless I tell yum

Re: another spin of TeX Live 2009 packages

2009-08-31 Thread Patrice Dumas
Hello, I haven't followed closely the new packaging of texlive, so you should take my comments with caution... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The new packages obsolete the ancient tetex stuff: tetex-tex4ht I think that the stand-alone tex4ht could be better

Re: #! /usr/bin/perl preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Pádraig Brady
Stepan Kasal wrote: Hello, at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env . Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of this mail is the same.) Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see

Re: fscanf problem in glibc shipped with latest F11 updates.

2009-08-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:45:17PM +0300, Maz The Northener wrote: I found out that after I updated my F11 a few days ago, fscanf started missbehaving. I filed a bug report in bugzilla. (bug 520414) but since I have not heard anyone else yelling about this, I thought that maybe this is my

Re: fscanf problem in glibc shipped with latest F11 updates.

2009-08-31 Thread Maz The Northener
Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to work without extra defines with older glibc. On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jakub Jelinekja...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:45:17PM +0300, Maz The Northener wrote: I found out that after I updated my F11 a

Correction: #! /usr/bin/perl NOT preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello all. In short: #!/usr/bin/env perl is OK in Fedora. In my previous mail, I asked you to delete the (/usr)?/bin/env calls from #! lines of Fedora scripts. I would like to withdraw that request. A discussion followed that post on fedora-perl-devel-list, which actually proved that

Re: fscanf problem in glibc shipped with latest F11 updates.

2009-08-31 Thread Maz The Northener
And just a öast nail in coffin: I tried with -D_GNU_SOURCE and it worked like you told. On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Maz The Northenermazziesacco...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to work without extra defines with older glibc. On Mon,

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-31 Thread James Antill
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:06 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: AT == Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net writes: AT I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually AT or automatically, does it? yum does keep track of many things in the yumdb and I think the reason key

Re: fscanf problem in glibc shipped with latest F11 updates.

2009-08-31 Thread Ulrich Drepper
On 08/31/2009 07:26 AM, Maz The Northener wrote: Thanks for quick answer :) I was just puzzled because this seemed to work without extra defines with older glibc. Only by accident. We had no C99-compatibility version of *scanf in those older versions. We have now. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-31 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, James Antill wrote: ...you don't get rid of any extra stuff you got with blah, hopefully yum history undo will solve that in a better way by recording what happened at #1 and undoing it instead of trying to piece together what might have happened at #1 after the fact.

Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent

2009-08-31 Thread Casey Dahlin
On 08/30/2009 12:11 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: 2009/8/30 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de: Hi, is dma packaged by someone? That would be the first step and I would happily test that thing (having postfix installed after Paul Frields advice which works well). I think I'll do

Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers

2009-08-31 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on it, or way I can submit

Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009

2009-08-31 Thread Thomas Moschny
2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com: Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and

Re: Packaging Request: Pure Data

2009-08-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Mani Aa.mani@gmail.com wrote: http://puredata.info/ is not in the package database. From the license POV, there are no problems. I think this is the bug your after. A review is in progress but there's a few build issues.

Re: how to determain those no longer required packages

2009-08-31 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:42:12AM -0400, James Antill wrote: On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 19:06 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: AT == Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net writes: AT I don't think apt traces whether a packages was a pulled in manually AT or automatically, does it? yum does

Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent

2009-08-31 Thread Neal Becker
Michel S. wrote: Hi all, With the recent discussion about removing sendmail from the base install, has anyone taken a look at DMA? It appears to be designed with exactly the same purpose in mind -- removing the dependency on a desktop-oriented install on sendmail or postfix, while still

Re: Packaging Request: Pure Data

2009-08-31 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Mani A wrote: http://puredata.info/ is not in the package database. From the license POV, there are no problems. Best A. Mani Hi, Fernando at planetccrma was working on packaging a recent version of puredata. I don't know the current status. There

Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009

2009-08-31 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:01 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit

Upcoming schedule tasks

2009-08-31 Thread John Poelstra
Name Start End Alpha Testing Tue 2009-08-25 Tue 2009-09-29 Compose Snap #1Wed 2009-09-02 Wed 2009-09-02 Snapshot 1 Wed

Re: Fedora linux 7

2009-08-31 Thread Thusitha Fernando
why old linux system now available Fedora12 alpha version Download and try it On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:08 AM, liuliu1103 liuliu1...@yeah.net wrote: I want to buy fedora linux 7 system .But I can't bought is recently Please tell me who have fedroa linux7 system, I am from China

Triggers just to avoid unowned directories?

2009-08-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
The packaging style in the nss-softokn package continues to bug me. There are RPM triggers being used to install/remove a prelink config file whenever the prelink package gets installed/removed. According to a comment in the spec file, it is only done like that because the package doesn't want

[Bug 520401] New: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.021 is available

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.021 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520401 Summary: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.021 is available

Re: #! /usr/bin/perl preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Chris Weyl wrote: Yeah. I've actually been running into that over the last couple months... at $work, we have machines at several different OS levels, and a smattering of RH, SLES, etc. Building and installing Perl independently of the system Perl helps get around some of the cruftiness of

[Bug 520153] testsuite fails because of openssl-1.0.0beta3 crash

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520153 Bug 520153 depends on bug 520152, which changed state. Bug 520152 Summary: command crashes: openssl dgst -dss1 ...

rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel sources, 1.2, 1.3 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-Devel-FindRef.spec, 1.4, 1.5

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31665 Modified Files: sources .cvsignore perl-Devel-FindRef.spec Log Message: Update to 1.422 Index: sources

rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec, 1.11, 1.12

2009-08-31 Thread Štěpán Kasal
Author: kasal Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32281 Modified Files: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec Log Message: re-enable tests Index: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec

rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel perl-Devel-FindRef.spec,1.5,1.6

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2233 Modified Files: perl-Devel-FindRef.spec Log Message: Update to 5 Index: perl-Devel-FindRef.spec

Re: #! /usr/bin/perl preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Pádraig Brady
Stepan Kasal wrote: Hello, at certain periods of time, it was recommended to use #!/usr/bin/env . Some people consider it ugly. (The humble opinion of the author of this mail is the same.) Currently there is popular mood to remove /usr/bin/env python, see

rpms/perl-IO-Async/devel sources, 1.2, 1.3 .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-IO-Async.spec, 1.2, 1.3

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Async/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2799 Modified Files: sources .cvsignore perl-IO-Async.spec Log Message: Update to 0.23 Index: sources ===

rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-11 sources,1.2,1.3 perl-IO-Async.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5194 Modified Files: sources perl-IO-Async.spec Log Message: UPdate to 0.23 Index: sources === RCS file:

[Bug 520153] testsuite fails because of openssl-1.0.0beta3 crash

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520153 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-10 sources,1.2,1.3 perl-IO-Async.spec,1.1,1.2

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Async/F-10 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5607 Modified Files: sources perl-IO-Async.spec Log Message: Update to 0.23 Index: sources === RCS file:

[Bug 520431] New: package unusable, missing dependency POE::Component::Pluggable

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: package unusable, missing dependency POE::Component::Pluggable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520431 Summary: package unusable, missing dependency

rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel perl-AnyEvent.spec,1.18,1.19

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17604 Modified Files: perl-AnyEvent.spec Log Message: Update to 5.112 Index: perl-AnyEvent.spec === RCS

rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel sources,1.13,1.14 .cvsignore,1.13,1.14

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18800 Modified Files: sources .cvsignore Log Message: Fix source Index: sources === RCS file:

Correction: #! /usr/bin/perl NOT preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello all. In short: #!/usr/bin/env perl is OK in Fedora. In my previous mail, I asked you to delete the (/usr)?/bin/env calls from #! lines of Fedora scripts. I would like to withdraw that request. A discussion followed that post on fedora-perl-devel-list, which actually proved that

rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel perl-AnyEvent.spec,1.19,1.20

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21539 Modified Files: perl-AnyEvent.spec Log Message: Misssing changelog Index: perl-AnyEvent.spec === RCS

rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel perl-AnyEvent.spec,1.20,1.21

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-AnyEvent/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21632 Modified Files: perl-AnyEvent.spec Log Message: Bump Index: perl-AnyEvent.spec === RCS file:

rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel Devel-FindRef-1.422-nocommon.patch, NONE, 1.1 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Devel-FindRef.spec, 1.6, 1.7

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-FindRef/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3628/devel Modified Files: import.log perl-Devel-FindRef.spec Added Files: Devel-FindRef-1.422-nocommon.patch Log Message: Add patch to get rid of common:sense

rpms/perl-BDB/devel sources, 1.6, 1.7 .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 perl-BDB.spec, 1.7, 1.8

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BDB/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4823 Modified Files: sources .cvsignore perl-BDB.spec Log Message: Update to 1.84 Index: sources === RCS file:

rpms/perl-BDB/devel BDB-1.84-nocommon.patch, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-BDB.spec, 1.8, 1.9

2009-08-31 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
Author: kwizart Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BDB/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6762/devel Modified Files: perl-BDB.spec Added Files: BDB-1.84-nocommon.patch import.log Log Message: Add patch to get rid of nosense BDB-1.84-nocommon.patch: BDB.pm

Re: Correction: #! /usr/bin/perl NOT preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote: Hello all. In short: #!/usr/bin/env perl is OK in Fedora. In my previous mail, I asked you to delete the (/usr)?/bin/env calls from #! lines of Fedora scripts. I would like to withdraw that request. A discussion followed

Re: Correction: #! /usr/bin/perl NOT preferred

2009-08-31 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 08/31/2009 11:28 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: So, is /usr/bin/env the preferred one, or is it the same in preference with /usr/bin/perl? I would not say that either is preferred. IMHO, you should leave upstream scripts in place, as long as they use either /usr/bin/env perl or /usr/bin/perl.

[Bug 520505] New: Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More)

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 Summary: Spurious dependency on perl(Test::More) Product:

[Bug 520530] New: cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl as dependency to created rpms?

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl as dependency to created rpms? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530 Summary: cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl

[Bug 520530] cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl as dependency to created rpms?

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530 --- Comment #1 from Penelope Fudd ker...@pkts.ca 2009-08-31 19:05:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359331) --

[Bug 520530] cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl as dependency to created rpms?

2009-08-31 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2009-08-31 19:13:06 EDT --- It comes from here:

rpms/perl-JSON/devel perl-JSON.spec,1.15,1.16

2009-08-31 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-JSON/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24663 Modified Files: perl-JSON.spec Log Message: * Mon Aug 31 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.15-3 - update filtering Index: perl-JSON.spec

rpms/perl-JSON/F-11 perl-JSON.spec,1.14,1.15

2009-08-31 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-JSON/F-11 In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27457 Modified Files: perl-JSON.spec Log Message: * Mon Aug 31 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2.15-3 - update filtering Index: perl-JSON.spec