On 09/13/2009 12:31 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
Projects hosted on fho should use the Fedora instance, since
transifex.net does not yet have write access to fedorahosted. Projects
hosted on github etc should use transifex.net, since it has built-in
access for them.
What would it take to
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 19:46 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:24:06 +0200, Stefan wrote:
Hi,
I would like to become a co-maintainer for an _existing_ RPM package. I
already red the following link
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join but they are
Dimitris Glezos wrote:
Indeed -- the above are true. www.transifex.net is intended as an
upstream, common translation place for open source projects (not meant
to replace translate.fpo).
Well, I must have misread the blog post of one of you guys then (and I
wasn't able to find it again when I
Aditya Patawari wrote:
which will have all the packages of live cd
Which one? There's more than one live CD… I presume you mean the GNOME
(Desktop) one given where you cross-posted this. I think we'll either need
more than one live DVD or the live DVD will have to carry more than one
desktop
Well, as per the info provided by Kevin creating more than one live DVD is
recommended. Also it makes more sense as the live dvd will copy the files
onto the system. Environment selection is tricky and can result into an
unstable or bug prone release.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Kevin
Aditya Patawari wrote:
Well, as per the info provided by Kevin creating more than one live DVD is
recommended.
I can take up the idea of a KDE Live DVD with KDE SIG. (I'm cross-posting
this mail to fedora-kde.) The DVD size would allow us to include more stuff,
like translations (kde-l10n-*,
Thanks Kevin for all this help. I understand that mirroring it will be
difficult due to space constraints. I'll take this to fedora infrastructure
as soon as we have enough members on SIG. I see that you haven't joined the
SIG yet, please do join it soon.
Live DVD SIG :
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
This looks like a nice initiative. I hope it will lead to more reviews getting
done and reduce the waiting time.
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
Below is the
number of package reviews completed.
[55 bugzilla links]
Total reviews modified: 55
I think the wording needs
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 13/09/2009 20:29, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
The DVD size would allow us to include more stuff,
like translations (kde-l10n-*, those are fairly huge and there are many
supported languages), input method
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
I think the cleanest way to fix this is to have a post-installation
program for the Live CD image which offers to Complete your
installation? and does the PackageKit equivalent of yum groupinstall
corresponding comps
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Aditya Patawari
adi...@adityapatawari.com wrote:
We thought of this earlier. Being a fedora ambassador when I go to promote
fedora the most common problem I hear is that people are not able to get
everything from repo due to bad internet connection
Right,
Great Idea!!
It would be really nice if this could be implemented successfully.
Live CD + An internal Repo + A bit of php coding to choose the packages =
Live DVD
Genius :)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Right, understood. What I'm arguing is that
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:10:35 -0400
Tom \spot\ Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/12/2009 07:05 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
If and when they do so, then (and ONLY THEN) is it appropriate for
you to have:
Requires: foo%{isa}
Ugh, this should be:
Requires: bar%{isa}
(as I
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 15:07 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
Hello,
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept ...
This means 1st till 12th September, right? What about
On 09/12/2009 12:13 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
I did two installs yesterday, and both of them have ended up with
SELINUX=disabled in /etc/selinux/config
I changed them back to 'enabled', rebooted, which caused a relabel,
and all seems fine.
What's happening here ?
Dave
I don't know
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved reviews,
not finished ones. Not sure
2009/9/14 Rakesh Pandit wrote:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed? In the past we counted approved
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Crypt-DSA/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17463
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Crypt-DSA.spec sources
Added Files:
perl-Crypt-DSA-dsaparam.patch
Log Message:
* Fri Sep 11 2009 Paul Howarth
18 matches
Mail list logo
