Dne neděle 20 září 2009 18:28:14 Steve Grubb napsal(a):
On Saturday 19 September 2009 07:25:13 pm Matej Cepl wrote:
Steve Grubb, Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:24:18 -0400:
I also think that the reason xinetd came into existence in the first
place has long since passed.
Do you think that Fedora
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:13:33PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:45:10PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
If you have a machine with an Intel graphics chip, I need your help.
I'm trying to make LVDS connection detection actually reliable, and I
think I have a solution that
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:55 +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
otherwise)
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 12:44 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
As far as I can tell, gnome-desktop doesn't include explicit (default or
otherwise) fonts either.
I haven't
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 05:55 +, Matej Cepl wrote:
Colin Walters, Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:46:50 +:
These are wrong and should be in the comps group. Looks like Matthias
added them. I'll move them to comps now.
Which seems like to typical Fedora event ... after all FESCO approved
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:08 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Because they're not the default, the defaults are defined in the @fonts
group, this is an experiment by the desktop team, without any
concertation, or understanding on how we managed fonts so far.
Given that fact that
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:08 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Because they're not the default, the defaults are defined in the @fonts
group, this is an experiment by the desktop team, without any
concertation, or understanding on how we managed fonts so far.
Given that fact that
On 09/21/2009 11:41 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 21/09/09 16:33, Warren Togami wrote:
Should we obsolete and remove perl-Mail-SPF-Query? Apparently
perl-Mail-SPF obsoleted perl-Mail-SPF-Query ~3 years ago.
Really? Says who? It certainly doesn't provide any implementation of
Mail::SPF::Query.
As reported by Jesse Keating and me, currently live CD builds - since
20090918, 20090917 was the last working one - appear to be entirely
broken. Boot fails with 'no root device found', booting from CD or USB.
This will be a problem for the beta test compose that's coming up in a
couple of days.
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:41:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote
As reported by Jesse Keating and me, currently live CD builds - since
20090918, 20090917 was the last working one - appear to be entirely
broken. Boot fails with 'no root device found', booting from CD or
USB. This will be a
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 20:52 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:41:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote
As reported by Jesse Keating and me, currently live CD builds - since
20090918, 20090917 was the last working one - appear to be entirely
broken. Boot fails with 'no
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As reported by Jesse Keating and me, currently live CD builds - since
20090918, 20090917 was the last working one - appear to be entirely
broken. Boot fails with 'no root device found', booting from CD or USB.
A full scrollback of the
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:52:44 +0200
Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de wrote:
Hi.
...snip...
Do you have kexec-tools in the spin/buildroot? If you do, does it
work without it?
kexec-tools is not installed on the machine that composes the nightly
spins.
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I noticed that the
file ncrack-services is placed in /usr/share/ncrack by default. Since it
is a kind of configuration file that contains
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:33:38AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
Should we obsolete and remove perl-Mail-SPF-Query? Apparently
perl-Mail-SPF obsoleted perl-Mail-SPF-Query ~3 years ago.
Honestly, I have no strong feelings on the matter. I switched
amavisd-new over quite a while ago...
spampd
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I noticed that the
file ncrack-services is placed in /usr/share/ncrack by default. Since it
is a
On 09/21/2009 04:36 PM, Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:33:38AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
Should we obsolete and remove perl-Mail-SPF-Query? Apparently
perl-Mail-SPF obsoleted perl-Mail-SPF-Query ~3 years ago.
Honestly, I have no strong feelings on the matter. I
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On 09/21/2009 04:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Martin Gieseking wrote:
during the review of ncrack
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199) I noticed that the
file
MAS == Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silva...@gmail.com writes:
MAS Who is this Piotr Drag and why is he suddenly Cc:ing himself on
MAS very old bug requests?
I assume you mean un-ccing himself. Do you believe he has violated
some rule by removing himself from the CC list of several bugs? I
On 09/21/2009 05:06 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
Nope.
spampd.spec contains...
# This is optional, but the spf checks get disabled if it's absent
Requires: perl(Mail::SPF::Query)
I'm updating this.
Warren
spampd was requiring perl(Mail::SPF::Query) for no good reason. Rather
than require
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-PAR-Dist/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22614
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-PAR-Dist.spec sources
Log Message:
new upstream version
Index: .cvsignore
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-PAR-Packer/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3821
Added Files:
perl-PAR-Packer-cflags.patch perl-PAR-Packer-open.patch
Log Message:
- patch to use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- patch to submit the third parameter to open()
Author: steve
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Class/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6217
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Test-Class.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 0.33.
Update Source0 URL.
Add LICENSE.
BR Test::Pod, Test::CPAN::Meta, and
23 matches
Mail list logo
