I am wondering if there is any documentation on tips for packagers for
helping them integrate sound features of their packages in Fedora.
In my specific case the volume controls on glest are not affecting the
volume in F12 and I am wondering where to start looking for infomation
that may be
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 18:56 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
Just received:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528237
yum install libotf-devel.i586 libotf-devel.x86_64
yields:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/libotf-config from
On 10/10/2009 01:48 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 18:56 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
What if the generated docbook documents are different due to different
ids? Do we need to separate the docs into a noarch
Compose started at Sat Oct 10 06:15:04 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
konversation-1.2-1.fc12.i686 requires kdelibs4 = 0:4.3.2
sugar-toolkit-0.86.0-1.fc12.i686 requires python-json
Broken deps for x86_64
Maybe off topic but, how to correct color schemes for Epson Printers?
Default is horrible (excess of red, wrong gamma/brightness, etc). I
guess someone must have dealt with that.
Best regards
CdAB
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 22:25 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 16:41 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
It's not to be considered a bug, AFAIK. We don't stipulate that
development packages be installable side-by-side in this way, we
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:57:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It would be nice to have more comprehensive 3D tests.
I think it's worth packaging the piglit OopenGL test suite:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/piglit
and using it in graphics test days.
According tho this blog post by Eric Anholt and
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:02 +, Scott Tsai wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:57:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It would be nice to have more comprehensive 3D tests.
I think it's worth packaging the piglit OopenGL test suite:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/piglit
and using it in graphics
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 11:30 +0300 schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote:
If the contents of the file is the same and they only their timestamps
differ, you can touch them reversely after install as in
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Timestamp differences do NOT cause file conflicts.
Indeed, obviously this has changed. Changes like this should be
announced somewhere, I guess Kevin and me are not the only one packagers
who still believe they have to
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 18:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 07:47:59 -0700, Adam wrote:
Of course, that turns the larger question into 'why do we put i686
-devel packages in the x86-64 repo, not just the lib packages',
Because not all files in -devel packages cover
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 10:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I guess the point is that if we actually intend to support 'you can
cross-compile with any -devel package from another arch that's included
gah, I know I don't really mean cross-compile, it's been pointed out to
me before that it's the
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 10/11/2009 01:09 AM +9:00:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:32:40 +0200, Patrice wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Timestamp differences do NOT cause file conflicts.
Indeed, obviously this has changed. Changes like this should be
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Chitlesh GOORAH:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2]. Chitlesh even tried
to contact him for more than
Original Message
Subject: Development packages for Thunderbird/Sunbird
From: Henrik /KaarPoSoft hen...@kaarposoft.dk
To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Date: 09.10.2009 18:20
I would like blueZync to work on Fedora too
(currently developing on Debian and Ubuntu).
Me too. I
I'm having trouble getting the new version of libprojectM packaged,
and hope someone can shed some light on this for me. When I enter the
commands to build it manually, it builds fine, but when trying to
package it, it comes out with commands like:
cd
Henrik /KaarPoSoft, Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:20:44 +0200:
However, to compile blueZync, development packages for thunderbird and
sunbird are needed
(i.e. header files, idl files etc).
As far as I can see, not such -devel packages are available for Fedora
11 or 12.
When you install
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:17:16AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, that's only valid if we actually do anything to ensure multilib
compilation actually *works*, right now all we enforce is that the
packages don't conflict (which isn't the same thing at all).
It's also valid if we want to
Just upgraded my F11 workstation, which included an upgrade to
thunderbird-3.0-2.7.b4.fc11.x86_64
Without any prompting or warning, my email layout -- a key interface
into my open source development workflow -- was changed to use something
called smart folders.
Also annoying, though of
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv21298
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-URI.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Oct 10 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22961
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Oct 10 2009 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.27-1
- update to
Author: iarnell
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27084
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File.spec
sources
Log Message:
* Sat Oct 10 2009 Iain Arnell
22 matches
Mail list logo
