On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:58 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a
piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This isn't
a nice place to be in as a downstream.
On 11/08/2009 02:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:58 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote:
Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a
piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This
Compose started at Sun Nov 8 08:15:08 UTC 2009
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 0
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I have seen on some Dells (as well as my brother's new one yesterday),
that their wireless chip just says Dell wireless (give or take a
word/number or two). What actual chipset/driver does that use and does
it work with Fedora out of the box?
Sorry for asking that type question here, but if I
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 07:51 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
I have seen on some Dells (as well as my brother's new one yesterday),
that their wireless chip just says Dell wireless (give or take a
word/number or two). What actual chipset/driver does that use and does
it work with Fedora out of the
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:38:38 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:06:14 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:57:42 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 17:18:16 -0700,
Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 03:31:45PM +0200, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
I've got quite simple question from dovecot's upstream: Why do we have rw
access on mails for mail group?
There are two popular models for MTA/MDAs. Run as root and drop
priviledges to the receiving user or run under another
I renamed binary in the Rawhide's package and filled bug against xqf.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
why don't we make it official that we're the new-old-grub upstream and
give it a shiny new name and a website? it's not like we're not the
upstream for half the rest of the stack, it'd hardly be a radical new
venture...
Well we do
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:23:08AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:38:38 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I tried grabbing http://dl.sf.net/glest/glest_data_3.2.1.zip and it
seemed to work. The actual URL in the spec file has the %version
macro.
Is the
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier to work with GRUB2 folks to add the missing
features we need?
In theory yes, that's how it's supposed to go. In practice, with
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 20:59:12 +0100,
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
The SourceURL Guidelines[0] mandate to use in this case
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/glest/glest_data_3.2.1.zip
instead of the dl.sf.net version.
I made the change in CVS in the devel branch to help me
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:28:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 21:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1800
We wanted to get some testing on the new updates repos before enabling
them to the world, that's why they
Thanks a lot, every helper.
I am just so surprising that why grub2 in Fedora is 1.98 however the
official version is 1.97. In fact grub2 in Fedora is older that official
release. Why not follow the official release version? Does Fedora hope that
grub2 replaces grub when GNU release grub2-1.98?
I
The following packages, which are marked as dead in the CVS F-12 tree,
have builds tagged with f12-final:
fonts-hebrew-fancy
knm_new-fonts
koan
lam
python-sqlite2
scim-tomoe
Quentin Armitage
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Can we have perl-Email-Date-Format for EPEL - EL5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533732
Summary: Can we have perl-Email-Date-Format for EPEL - EL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Can we have perl-Regexp-Assemble for EPEL - EL5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533733
Summary: Can we have perl-Regexp-Assemble for EPEL - EL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Can we have perl-XML-LibXSLT for EPEL - EL5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533734
Summary: Can we have perl-XML-LibXSLT for EPEL - EL5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533732
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533733
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533733
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Build perl-Test-File-Contents for EL-5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533773
Summary: Build perl-Test-File-Contents for EL-5
Product:
22 matches
Mail list logo
