-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have forked libtar as libtar-ng, because the upstream does not have
time to maintain it anymore.
Here is the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169
Now the question is what is a private fork?
Am i wrong in forking it and
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:07:29 +0530, Huzaifa wrote:
I have forked libtar as libtar-ng, because the upstream does not have
time to maintain it anymore.
Here is the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169
Now the question is what is a private fork?
Am i wrong in forking it
On 12/11/2009 02:07 PM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have forked libtar as libtar-ng, because the upstream does not have
time to maintain it anymore.
Here is the bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169
Now the
2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
domain would be sufficient, however we should have a discussion about
whether to use this email address or to use the user's real email
address.
Definitely @fedoraproject.org
On Friday, 11 December 2009 at 02:38, Jon Stanley wrote:
The following items will be discussed at tomorrow's FESCo meeting, at
17:00UTC (noon EST) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
[...]
291 Man pages Packaging Guideline
Um, what? This was tabled for further discussion during the last
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name and may be even to forward the old
mailing list and web page the to new ones.
But I am not sure if you are living the the best of all possible worlds...
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That was already denied
https://lists.feep.net:8080/pipermail/libtar/2009-May/000259.html
Rahul
--
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That was already denied
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 16:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That was already denied
On 12/11/2009 04:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to continue
the project under its original name
That
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:43:16 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 04:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:14:40 +0530, Rahul wrote:
On 12/11/2009 03:56 PM, Florian Festi wrote:
Without knowing the history:
Best solution would be to ask former upstream for permission to
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:05 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
domain would be sufficient, however we should have a discussion about
whether to use this email address or to use the
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
A big -1 for this. Your A lot is in fact a tiny fraction and for
some of us an e-mail address is important mean for identifying an user
(Oh, this is John Doe of Canonical, ...).
I use mine exclusively and I think referring to the generic address
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 07:11 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/07/2009 10:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria under
Beta Release Requirements, Item 10 The installer must be able to
successfully complete an upgrade
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 14:07, Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:05 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
domain would be sufficient, however we should have a
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 14:12, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
A big -1 for this. Your A lot is in fact a tiny fraction and for
some of us an e-mail address is important mean for
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:05 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/12/11 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com:
For the initial testing, just giving every user a @feodraproject.org
domain would be sufficient, however we should have a discussion about
whether to use this email address or to use the
Hi.
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:11:52 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
manually. Does this mean that the Fedora officially Supports
upgrades now?
Were upgraded installs not always supported, as long as the upgrade
did not take place within the running system?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 14:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release criteria.
John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final
content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA
(myself, Will
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 08:12 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
And let me put it this way: if fedora decides to post my non @fp.o address
somewhere, like in git entries, I'm going to be extremely pissed off about
it.
I think this would depend on what gets configured for your git client
for fedora
On 12/10/2009 09:01 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:38:10 -0200
Henrique Juniorhenrique...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that postgresql is great, but MariaDB is expanding very fast.
I'm not the best person to opine about databases, my experience is very
limited, but it would be
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:53 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Not sure if this has been raised yet, but are we specifying when in the
release that packages should be signed with a valid signature? I
believe packages are signed at all release milestones, but I'd like to
clear up that assumption.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:53:40 -0500,
James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
Not sure if this has been raised yet, but are we specifying when in the
release that packages should be signed with a valid signature? I
believe packages are signed at all release milestones, but I'd like to
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:53 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Not sure if this has been raised yet, but are we specifying when in the
release that packages should be signed with a valid signature? I
believe packages are signed at all release milestones, but I'd like to
clear up that assumption.
Do
On 11/29/2009 11:29 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/11/29 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee:
Hello,
snip
Comments?
I'm the maintainer for log4net but unfortunately not for nant. I've
finally gotten around to looking at this.
Debian have a policy[1] of using a standard mono.snk which
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 08:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:53 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Not sure if this has been raised yet, but are we specifying when in the
release that packages should be signed with a valid signature? I
believe packages are signed at all
2009/12/11 Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu:
MB == Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk writes:
MB Here is a list of review requests that are not yet assigned to a
MB reviewer:
Rather than huge bugzilla queries, why not just
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ?
Neat, I didn't
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:05 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:59 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:51:55AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
I did a clean install of Fedora 12 and realized
that pavucontrol was not installed by default.
I have two sound
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 21:45 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
You can still do all the heavy lifting you want. Install the old
gst-mixer,
I actually dropped gst-mixer with F12, as we planned all along. So that
one's not an option for F12.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
build against webkitgtk if I were to build the latest as a potential
stable update for
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 13:40 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
I couldn't disagree more strongly. As a Linux user, I want the show me
everything option. I don't care if I have to check a box to do it, but
I want to see all the knobs and dials. And I at least expect not to have
what I'm doing with
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 13:46 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
All paranoia and ranting aside, there is some truth to this. There is a
definite trend in the Linux community to want to cater to the lowest
common denominator by being more Mac/Windows-esque. I put up with it
because I can usually ignore
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:32, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
It's going to be a bit of a bumpy first yum upgrade. You will likely have
to reboot with 'reboot -f', as the job formats have changed
slightly, and the communication with
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 12:38 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
Jef, I'll help with istanbul. If anyone else out there is considering
doing so, please feel free to team up with me.
Other than revelation(which essentially
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/5 Paulo Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com:
There are some old v4l applications that do not work in Fedora 12.
I found so far fmtools and gnomeradio.
I will have a look on fmtools in ew days, but until then, patches
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:57 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.12.2009 07:36, Vasily Levchenko napsal(a):
Does it not work without an xorg.conf, that would be the first goal.
No.
File a bug please, attaching your xorg.conf, Xorg.0.log and output of
the dmesg command (all from inside of
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 13:46 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
All paranoia and ranting aside, there is some truth to this. There is a
definite trend in the Linux community to want to cater to the lowest
common denominator by being more
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
build against webkitgtk if I
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:32:18 -0800,
darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote:
I updated from my machine from koji (yes, I know, even more insane than from
rawhide)
I do that from time to time. A cherry pick koji builds regularly. But when
rawhide is frozen (or composes are broken) for a
I am sending this on behalf of Dave Lawrence and the bugzilla team at
Red Hat. Please forward this on to any appropriate lists that were
missed.
Greetings,
The Red Hat Bugzilla team is happy to announce the second public beta
release of the next version of Red Hat Bugzilla based on
It's making use of some deprecated functionality for example
gnomevfs which really should be ported to the newer gvfs stuff.
There are probably some pygtk/gtk-isms which need to be updated. I'm
willing to carry this as downstream patches if I have to but I really
don't want to do that.
Less
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:12 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
It's making use of some deprecated functionality for example
gnomevfs which really should be ported to the newer gvfs stuff.
There are probably some pygtk/gtk-isms which need to be updated. I'm
willing to carry this as downstream
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:02:04 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the
current release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I
wanted to shoot out to the list
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:38 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
There is currently a new incremental release to webkitgtk (the current
release in F12 is 1.1.15-3, latest is 1.1.15-4) and I wanted to shoot
out to the list to find out if there is anything that would need a new
build against webkitgtk if I
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
snip
Note that this update does not change ABI.
It's a stable bugfix release only...
kevin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Sorry,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com wrote:
SNIP
From my own brief testing, Epiphany has no apparent problems with it
either.
I think it should be fine as an update; but like any other version bump,
we'd want to have it in updates-testing for a reasonable
On 12/11/2009 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:57 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.12.2009 07:36, Vasily Levchenko napsal(a):
Does it not work without an xorg.conf, that would be the first goal.
No.
File a bug please, attaching your xorg.conf, Xorg.0.log and output
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:14 -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
On 12/11/2009 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:57 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.12.2009 07:36, Vasily Levchenko napsal(a):
Does it not work without an xorg.conf, that would be the first goal.
No.
File
It doesn't work with konqueror. Neither did it's predecessor.
It keeps asking for a password on every page. I am not doing anything with
cookies. I have no problem with original bugzilla.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 19:39 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 12:38:11PM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jef, I'll help with istanbul. If anyone else out there is considering
doing so, please
There will be an outage starting at 2009-12-12 11:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 48 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2009-12-12 11:00 UTC'
Affected Services:
Buildsystem
CVS / Source Control
Le vendredi 11 décembre 2009 à 11:31 -0800, Adam Williamson a écrit :
It also encourages lazy interface design - the designer can always
think
'well, I'll just make this a checkbox under 'advanced' somewhere',
rather than considering how to properly design a single configuration
interface.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Pari:
e5f970b7a351f671e0641fa8266ce770 Math-Pari-2.01080603.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Math-Pari/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22556
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Math-Pari.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 2.01080603 (see Changes for details)
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539163
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-12-11 13:21:45 EDT ---
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-0.68-5.fc13.x86_64 requires librpm.so.0()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-0.68-5.fc13.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.0()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-0.68-5.fc13.i686 requires librpm.so.0
Author: lkundrak
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-RPM2/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25286
Modified Files:
perl-RPM2.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Dec 11 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk - 0.68-6
- Rebuild for RPM 4.8.0
Index: perl-RPM2.spec
Hi,
I am cross posting this to both the Debian and the Fedora Perl
mailing lists. I hope this won't cause problems to either of you.
On FOSDEM in Brussels on 6-7 February 2010 there are going
to be two rooms for cross-distro talks.
I suggested on the FOSDEM mailing list to have a set of talks
58 matches
Mail list logo
