Compose started at Fri Jan 1 08:15:07 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0
cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
What's wrong with ABRT?
Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older.
And later? - Recently, in all the
2009/12/31 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 12/30/2009 02:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
It would be nice if others could join in (be it virtual not necessarily
physically). So are there any takers for this ?
I am looking to generate interest in getting software that is not
included in
No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil.
And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:04:59 +0100, Kevin wrote:
What's wrong with ABRT?
My main beef with it is that it reports its crashes to the downstream bug
tracker when really the right people to fix them are the upstream
developers. KCrash/DrKonqi is much better there.
Well, upstream would want
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run the spec).
The idea is I drop each patch, build and
2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run the
Jud Craft wrote:
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
It's our policy not to bundle system libraries. We're not the only ones,
Debian also has such a policy. Bundling libraries in applications sucks in a
distribution, the library which is part
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch:
88d23450667d6a4948c41e10ec0e0ba0 CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Author: eseyman
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19216
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 2.17
Index: .cvsignore
10 matches
Mail list logo