rawhide report: 20100101 changes

2010-01-01 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jan 1 08:15:07 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0 anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0 cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-01 Thread drago01
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: What's wrong with ABRT? Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older. And later? - Recently, in all the

Re: Fedora Linux Format software review: January 2010

2010-01-01 Thread Christopher Brown
2009/12/31 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com: On 12/30/2009 02:15 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: It would be nice if others could join in (be it virtual not necessarily physically). So are there any takers for this ? I am looking to generate interest in getting software that is not included in

Re: Mono.Cecil monodevelop-debugger-mdb

2010-01-01 Thread Jud Craft
No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil. And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community? Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their software, after all.

Re: ABRT considered painful

2010-01-01 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:04:59 +0100, Kevin wrote: What's wrong with ABRT? My main beef with it is that it reports its crashes to the downstream bug tracker when really the right people to fix them are the upstream developers. KCrash/DrKonqi is much better there. Well, upstream would want

Fixing the kernel for intel laptops

2010-01-01 Thread Paul
Hi, I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again (see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install srpm, copy the kernel, run the spec). The idea is I drop each patch, build and

Re: Fixing the kernel for intel laptops

2010-01-01 Thread Christopher Brown
2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk: Hi, I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again (see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install srpm, copy the kernel, run the

Re: Mono.Cecil monodevelop-debugger-mdb

2010-01-01 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jud Craft wrote: Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their software, after all. It's our policy not to bundle system libraries. We're not the only ones, Debian also has such a policy. Bundling libraries in applications sucks in a distribution, the library which is part

File CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.17.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2010-01-01 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch: 88d23450667d6a4948c41e10ec0e0ba0 CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.17.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list

rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-01-01 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
Author: eseyman Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19216 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec sources Log Message: Update to 2.17 Index: .cvsignore