2010/1/1 Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm trying to get my Intel graphics driven laptop up and running again
(see BZ 523646 for details of the problem) and am trying to rebuild the
kernel using the latest from kernel.org and the fedora srpm (install
srpm, copy the kernel, run the
On 12/31/2009 07:11 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2009/12/29 Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com:
What's wrong with ABRT?
Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
bugzilla. Incredibly useful. A wonderful improvement over F-11 and older.
And later? - Recently,
On 12/29/2009 09:40 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
Originally, with stock F-12, I had received a couple of good backtraces in
bugzilla.
, and then it's
quite often unreliable in delivering bug reports or making it
(warning: added cross posting to fedora-devel)
Ramesh.R wrote:
You can use 32 bit OS in 64 bit processor.
32 bit address bus will use 64 bit. MSB 32 bits will be idle..
But for the case, 64 bit OS in a 32 bit processor is not possible by theory.
No one is talking about that. You are not
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri wrote:
ABRT 1.0.2 should fix the problems with installing the debug packages,
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories
is down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in
working directory and there is
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories is
down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in working
directory and there is not much ABRT can do about this.
Which YUM bug # is it?
Could you
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 11:53 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
[...]
ABRT 1.0.2 should fix the problems with installing the debug packages,
Does this mean ABRT 1.0.2 installs those missing debuginfo packages
automatically and also _removes_ them after the bug was committed?
I'm not really familiar
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories is
down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in working
directory
Hi,
You can't expect everyone to change their software design to work
for
Fedora, even if it has disadvantages.
We do expect that, sorry. Bundling libraries is not a solution, fixing
the library not to break its ABI/API every couple days is.
Here I have to agree with you Kevin.
Compose started at Sat Jan 2 08:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevolution-mail-shared.so.0
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libefilterbar.so.0
cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:39:07 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
When the debuginfo package of a particular binary is
installed, then the symbols are loaded whenever the binary is loaded or
are the symbols only considered by tools like gdb and so on?
The latter.
Moreover ABRT does not
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:47 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories is
down - then the yum fails
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:47 +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled
I am working on getting squashfs-tools 4.1 in rawhide. It has wrapper
functions that are set up to use streaming compression/uncompression
from the LZMA SDK 4.65 library.
Currently the LZMA SDK 4.32 library is in Fedora, but is no longer supported
upstream and is not compatible with 4.65.
I
Hi,
Packaging up monodevelop-boo and I've hit a problem with find_lang which
I can't figure out as everything seems fine!
I have the %find_lang %{name} in the %install section where name =
monodevelop-boo (which is the correct name for the translation files).
When the spec file reaches this
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 01:22 +, Paul wrote:
The build is producing the following
mkdir
-p
/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/monodevelop-boo-2.2-1.fc13.i386/usr/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/BooBinding/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/
cp '../build/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/monodevelop-boo.mo'
16 matches
Mail list logo
