Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 09:37 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
I intend to give up the following packages:
preferences-menus
I'm a friend of nested menus, so I'm going to take it.
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 10:33 + schrieb Richard Hughes:
I'm about to build PackageKit 0.6.0 into rawhide, which bumps the
soname. I'll take care of rebuilding gnome-packagekit and kpackagekit
which is (I think) are the only users of the low level library API.
Plus
Am Samstag, den 19.12.2009, 21:44 +0100 schrieb Simon Wesp:
Hi all,
fresh orphaned packages:
...
xpad: Sticky notepad for GTK+2
Bugs: 0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/xpad
I have taken xpad (at least on F11 and F12, package-db wouldn't let me
take it on rawhide).
Am Montag, den 30.11.2009, 14:42 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves:
If I run:
for i in $(repoquery --disablerepo=rpmfusion\* -f *.la
--qf=%{name}.%{arch} | grep x86_64 | sort | uniq); do repoquery -s
$i; done | sort | uniq
exo-0.3.105-1.fc12.src.rpm
fixed
gtkglextmm-1.2.0-10.fc12.src.rpm
I
Am Donnerstag, den 10.12.2009, 04:02 +0530 schrieb Debayan Banerjee:
ermm, I do know how to write spec files, and build RPMs, but am a bit
unsure about the process of uploading the packages upstream to Fedora
repos. Again, I shall Google and learn.
Am Donnerstag, den 26.11.2009, 13:13 + schrieb Rawhide Report:
Compose started at Thu Nov 26 08:15:08 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
gtranslator-1.9.6-2.fc13.i686 requires libsvn_fs_base-1.so.0
...
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 23:05 + schrieb Colin Walters:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Colin Walters wrote:
In an anonymous crash system, there should be a promote to bugzilla
link, where people could comment.
And how would you track
When two builds of the same version are done on the same day, the
rawhide report screws up the order of the changelog entries:
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 13:28 + schrieb Rawhide Report:
nimbus-0.1.4-2.fc13
---
* Sun Nov 22 2009 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 14:56 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:28 +0100, Christoph wrote:
When two builds of the same version are done on the same day, the
rawhide report screws up the order of the changelog entries:
Can this be fixed please?
See Yum
Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 11:24 + schrieb Matthew Booth:
To get useful bug reports from the unwashed
masses we need anonymous submission, or at least submission which
doesn't require any kind of account creation or authentication.
I disagree. As the maintainer, I need to be able to ask
This is a follow-up to my mail from October 9th [1]
As per unresponsive package maintainer policy, Claudio is now officially
considered missing in action and his packages [2] will be orphaned.
qtoctave - Frontend for Octave
1 Bug: 2 Menu entries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486753
Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar:
This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken,
since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it.
Why i pushed the update on older branches ? Maintainers are asked to
support branches until EOL and it
Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 17:27 -0400 schrieb Warren Togami:
Many Builds Not Tagged, but Probably Should Be
==
# koji list-tagged --latest dist-f12-updates-candidate
This command shows over 400 packages are built for F-12 but not tagged
for
Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 20:01 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:11:23AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
What really scares me is that there is a number of security updates in
bodhi that don't have a tag request in trac. Are maintainers that
careless? We don't want F12
Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2009, 17:01 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 01:11 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
What really scares me is that there is a number of security updates in
bodhi that don't have a tag request in trac. Are maintainers that
careless? We don't want F12
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those Requires.
rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 14:42 -0500 schrieb Rex Dieter:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.10.2009, 10:21 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Ismael Olea:
Description:
A complete Web authoring system for Linux Desktop users, similar to
Microsoft Windows programs like FrontPage and Dreamweaver.
Please remove that part. See
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 11:30 +0300 schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote:
If the contents of the file is the same and they only their timestamps
differ, you can touch them reversely after install as in
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/exo/devel
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Chitlesh GOORAH:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2]. Chitlesh even tried
to contact him for more than
I am starting the AWOL procedure [1] for Claudio Tomasoni, because he
didn't respond to a bug I opened 5 months ago [2]. Chitlesh even tried
to contact him for more than 7 months [3]. We should prepare for taking
over Claudio's packages [4].
If anybody knows whats up with Claudio or how to
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 18:56 -0400 schrieb Neal Becker:
Just received:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528237
yum install libotf-devel.i586 libotf-devel.x86_64
yields:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/libotf-config from install of libotf-devel-0.9.8-2.fc11.i586
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 19:48 -0400 schrieb Orcan Ogetbil:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
...
If the contents of the file is the same and they only their timestamps
differ, you can touch them reversely after install as in
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc
Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 12:04 -0500 schrieb Adam Miller:
Doesn't it mention somewhere in the wmii documentation that wmii is
not intended for packaging because many of the user configuration
options are to be set in a header file pre compile? I could be wrong
but seem to remember reading
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 15:26 + schrieb Matej Cepl:
I also wish to orphan these packages, and frankly I care about them much
less, so if nobody steps up, I will probably just let them die.
JSDoc -- Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles
nimbus -- Desktop
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 19:39 + schrieb Valent Turkovic:
Here you can see the bootchart from freshly built Fedora 11 updated
packages:
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/184632/bootchart-slow.png
I didn't know that akmods are part of a freshly installed Fedora. ;)
Regards,
Christoph
--
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 08:24 +0100 schrieb Howard Wilkinson:
Already made the decision to remove the file when building
During build is not enough. If we are not allowed to redistribute it, we
cannot distribute it in our source rpms ether.
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list
Am Dienstag, den 29.09.2009, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Josephine Tannhäuser:
btw. what was the reason for debian to drop webmin?
Dunno, maybe the fact that webmin is a weapon of mass destruction. ;)
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 17:05 +0200 schrieb H. Guémar:
I'll take :
* gazpacho
* poedit
I'd happy to co-maintain poedit with you, I use it quite regularly.
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 09:27 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/14 Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 00:48 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
2009/9/13 Björn Persson wrote:
Is it completed reviews or modified reviews?
Completed ones.
So why/when was this changed
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 15:07 +0530 schrieb Rakesh Pandit:
Hello,
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing Package
review components on bugzilla for last 12 days ending 12th Sept ...
This means 1st till 12th September, right? What about
First of all: Congrats for this
Am Freitag, den 04.09.2009, 09:43 +0200 schrieb Josephine Tannhäuser:
Perhaps it is luck, but I'm happy about that fact that not all
contributors with an open review request begging on devel list for a
reviewer. If anybody will do it, the devel list will
Am Freitag, den 04.09.2009, 12:41 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
First of all: Congrats for this
...catchy subject
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Am Montag, den 10.08.2009, 10:15 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
cwickert:BADURL:glista-0.4.tar.gz:glista
works with spectool
cwickert:BADURL:gwget-1.0.1.tar.bz2:gwget
404, new version, fixed.
cwickert:BADURL:lxde-settings-daemon-0.4.tar.bz2:lxde-settings-daemon
301, due to sf changes I guess.
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 10:32 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/17/2009 04:50 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 00:02 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/16/2009 11:07 PM, LinuxDonald wrote:
Only the devel packages conflicts.
Just in case, it is not clear. You
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 14:57 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/17/2009 02:23 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
See my first mail on this thread.
I did , but it doesn't explain why maintainers shouldn't be able to fix
it.
How would they be able to fix it exactly? openal-soft earlier
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 15:24 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
everything for those maintainers, who
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 16:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/17/2009 03:54 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 15:24 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite
Am Montag, den 17.08.2009, 00:02 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 08/16/2009 11:07 PM, LinuxDonald wrote:
Only the devel packages conflicts.
Just in case, it is not clear. You have broken every package that
depends on openal in Fedora 11 and Fedora 10 and there is no way for the
package
Am Freitag, den 14.08.2009, 14:39 -0300 schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
Hello guy's
for the people who don't have updated the kernel.
I'm running kernel-2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 and this one is not
supposed to be fixed, however...
http://grsecurity.net/%7Espender/wunderbar_emporium.tgz
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 18:08 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/06/2009 05:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
[snipped]
Sorry, you didn't pick up any of the bugs, none was assigned to you.
There is none assigned to me, because I turned away from this person's
reviews.
You can find
my POV).
This is what the review is for. The ones that are reviewed should be in
good shape, if not, please speak up in the reviews and CC me with the
address fedora at christoph - wickert . de.
Ralf
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 13:39 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/06/2009 12:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:44 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/06/2009 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
After requesting status updates, including direct email to the feature
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/06/2009 02:10 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I asked you to write down the problems
you found in bz and CC me, but so far I haven't received a mail.
I haven't received any mail from you.
Instead
you spend time
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 16:20 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 08/06/2009 02:18 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
* IM (NSH) O, the packaging quality of the submitted packages is close to
being inacceptable low.
Can you
Am Donnerstag, den 06.08.2009, 18:14 +0200 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
Low quality reviews - QED.
I can't stand lousy reviews ether, I often comment on already closed
reviews in order to show the reviewers problems they did not catch.
Someone even said what I did was a witch-hunting him, but
Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson:
Hi All,
Anyone interested in some review swaps? I have the following packages
that I need to get reviewed for Moblin so if you've got a package
you'd like to swap (or you've just got a few spare cycles for a plain
review) they
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:56 +0200 schrieb Till Maas:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:36:42PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
SMP == Steven M Parrish tuxbr...@fedoraproject.org writes:
SMP Summary: A MSN Messenger Clone
Please don't build a package with this summary.
Please
Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 16:47 + schrieb Gerd Pokorra:
Author: gerd
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/parrot/F-9
Ähm, F-9 ist end of lifetime, da kannst Du keine Updates mehr machen.
Ich würde dich bitten, die Änderungen im CVS wieder auf den Stand vorher
zurückzusetzen, damit es mit dem, was
Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
...
Sorry, this wasn't supposed to go to the list.
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 21:25 +0200 schrieb Edwin ten Brink:
I'm not sure where to file this bug against Red Hat Bugzilla.
On my Red Hat Bugzilla Front Page, under Open Issues: In Progress
Reported by You, no bugs appear even though there should be one in
progress. It seems that the
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 17:47 +0200 schrieb Pablo Martin-Gomez:
Le Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:58:43 -0700,
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com a écrit :
I've taken all the following packages, co-maintainer are welcome :
Unblocked orphan gconf-cleaner
Unblocked orphan gnome-specimen
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 16:57 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:41:57PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 13:22 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
cwickert: gwget,lxappearance,lxlauncher,lxsession-edit,lxshortcut
The epiphany extension
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 09:16 +0200 schrieb Jan Zelený:
Dne úterý 14 července 2009 19:20:02 Christoph Wickert napsal(a):
Anybody knows how to contact Tomáš Bžatek? Is he still working for Red
Hat? I see he has a lot of open bugs (some of them are just getting
closed by the bugzappers
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 13:48 -0300 schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
Hello guy's
anaconda can be fixed before F12 ALPHA to allow ext4 /boot ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486284
Already fixed in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112216
Regards,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 18:59 +0200 schrieb Christoph Wickert:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 13:48 -0300 schrieb Itamar Reis Peixoto:
Hello guy's
anaconda can be fixed before F12 ALPHA to allow ext4 /boot ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486284
Already fixed
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 16:22 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
I wonder... My build systems are running F11 using ext4 file system,
while the koji buildsystems will still be using ext3. It seems like
make is getting confused as to whether or not something got created;
timestamps may not be
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 08:09 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon:
Colin Walters wrote:
Another thing to keep in mind that immediately post-installation there
are going to be updates, which will at a minimum need desktop reset
(fast reboot experience), or more likely system restart.
I
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 20:12 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/14/2009 08:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 19:05 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 07/14/2009 07:02 PM, Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi,
although (as others pointed out) a reboot may
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 09:27 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon:
Douglas McClendon wrote:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 08:09 -0600 schrieb Douglas McClendon:
2. Imagine after the installation you switch rebootless to the new
system and install
Anybody knows how to contact Tomáš Bžatek? Is he still working for Red
Hat? I see he has a lot of open bugs (some of them are just getting
closed by the bugzappers) without a single comment from him. I set one
to NEEDINFO but didn't get a response for months.
Already time for AWOL procedure? [1]
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 13:23 -0500 schrieb Juan Rodriguez:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
Unblocked orphan glipper
If noone's taking care of glipper, I'll have to sign up, as I actually
*depend* on glipper to function properly.
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 11:27 -0600 schrieb Jerry James:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
wrote:
...
Unblocked orphan fmit
Are there really none that start with g-z, or did something quit after
fmit?
Yes, there was a new list sent
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 13:22 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
cwickert: gwget,lxappearance,lxlauncher,lxsession-edit,lxshortcut
The epiphany extension of gwget is known to be broken. Already reported
upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585401
Should I disable it for now?
The
Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Christoph Höger:
Hi,
since I sync my mail with the experimental gnome ui of offlineimap, I
encounter a small problem:
How do I tell cron to only invoke the job when I am logged in under
gnome only?
How about
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2009, 09:48 -0400 schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Thomas Janssen wrote:
2009/7/2 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org:
On 07/02/2009 06:15 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Is there a book group?
or what search parameter?
What happened to these updates?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5739
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5966
Is it a bodhi failure or a human one (both are from the same submitter)
Regards,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Am Freitag, den 19.06.2009, 13:55 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 06/19/2009 01:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
To sum it up: You say you wanted to work together with me, but you did
not contact me, you did not tell me and you did not send me your ks,
although you promised to do so
(@all: See fedora-list for previous postings.)
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 11:17 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
I had already did a remix based on LXDE a release before and I had the
kickstart and a working image a while earlier. The survey was done on
this list just to gauge interest in it
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 16:59 -0400 schrieb TK009:
On 06/18/2009 03:08 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
(@all: See fedora-list for previous postings.)
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 11:17 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
I had already did a remix based on LXDE a release before and I
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2009, 16:04 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On 06/18/2009 02:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
There is no SIG yet because A SIG needs APPROVAL from the board. But
there already are couple of people interested: Marc Wiriadisastra, Simon
Wesp, Sebastian Vahl and two
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 08:48 -0700 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
On 06/12/2009 08:14 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 05:34 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
I don't see what it buys our users if they get one big update over 2 small
ones.
In most cases the biggest
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 05:34 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Christoph Wickert wrote:
IMO this is something we should discuss on this list. We need to find a
fine balance between pushing updates in time to make maintainers happy
and not too many updates for the users. Maybe something like
Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 20:54 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Christoph
Wickertchristoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Some updates are processed after a day, others not for two weeks.
I'm a bit confused where your date is coming from. 2 weeks seems
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2009, 17:06 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
cwickert: gwget,xfce4-clipman-plugin
clipman-plugin is fixed, gwget only fixed in CVS and I'm waiting for the
buildsys to come up again.
Thanks for your report,
Christoph
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Am Montag, den 08.06.2009, 20:47 + schrieb David Zeuthen:
Author: davidz
[snipped]
--- NEW FILE polkit-gnome.spec ---
Summary: PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop
Name: polkit-gnome
Version: 0.92
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2
URL:
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 09:28 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:58 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
# for /usr/share/gnome/autostart
Requires: gnome-session
Great! This adds
gnome-session: 1.8 MB
control-center: 7.1 MB
GConf2: 5,5 MB
gnome
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 20:00 + schrieb Michael Schwendt:
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 20:30 +0530 schrieb Ankitkumar Rameshchandra
Patel:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 5 juin 2009 15:06, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel a écrit :
applications like gedit, nautilus showing square boxes instead of
Hindi text.
Actually, in F11
Am Samstag, den 23.05.2009, 09:52 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:35:58PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Also I've got a notion that FESCo recently approves more and more
proposals without asking the community for opinions first and even in
opposition to the community
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2009, 19:20 +0200 schrieb Jochen Schmitt:
Christoph Wickert schrieb:
When the flags proposal was announced to fedora-devel, so so a public
decision-making could take place *before* making a policy?
The proposal was not announced, it's ratification nether
81 matches
Mail list logo
