Jerry James wrote, at 12/01/2009 02:29 AM +9:00:
I'm looking into a gcl bug (I maintain gcl):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541050.
The problem appears to be that the order of RPM installation is
unpredictable. There is a subpackage, gcl-selinux, which provides
policy files for
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 12/01/2009 02:51 AM +9:00:
Jerry James wrote, at 12/01/2009 02:29 AM +9:00:
I'm looking into a gcl bug (I maintain gcl):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541050.
The problem appears to be that the order of RPM installation is
unpredictable
Nikola Pajkovsky wrote, at 11/19/2009 10:34 PM +9:00:
Author: npajkovs
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gpm/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16231
Modified Files:
gpm.spec
Log Message:
local build need this but koji not. wierd
Index: gpm.spec
Adam Jackson wrote, at 10/14/2009 03:20 AM +9:00:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the
Jameson wrote, at 10/11/2009 06:37 AM +9:00:
I'm having trouble getting the new version of libprojectM packaged,
and hope someone can shed some light on this for me.
Would you upload the srpm you are trying somewhere?
When I enter the
commands to build it manually, it builds fine, but when
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 10/11/2009 01:09 AM +9:00:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:32:40 +0200, Patrice wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Timestamp differences do NOT cause file conflicts.
Indeed, obviously this has changed. Changes like this should be
Quentin Armitage wrote, at 10/02/2009 04:43 PM +9:00:
I'm trying to build an old(ish) kernel (2.6.29.1-46-fc11.i586) on an
up-to-date F-11 system, but I keep getting a build failure. I have
tracked it down to the following.
At the beginning of the %install stage, it executes
'['
Jesse Keating wrote, at 09/30/2009 01:57 AM +9:00:
Just a reminder that the Fedora 12 freeze will be happening tonight at
0600 2009-09-30 UTC, just prior to the rawhide compose tonight. The
rawhide for 20090930 will be built from frozen content. You do not need
to send tag requests until
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 09:29 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
I have updated the packages for F-10 and F-11 with conflicts and without
obseltues :)
Explicit Conflicts need the approval of the Fedora Packaging Committee.
This occurs only on
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 11:47 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:39:37 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 09:29 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:04:14 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
I have updated the packages for F-10 and F-11 with conflicts and without
First of all, please make it clear under what branch
you want to discuss, devel, F-11 or F-10.
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/17/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:30:31 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 08/16/2009 11:47 PM +9:00:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 22:39:37 +0900,
Rawhide Report wrote, at 08/12/2009 07:14 PM +9:00:
Compose started at Wed Aug 12 06:15:05 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686
Please postpone fixing scriptlets for this issue until some
conclusion gets reached on fedora-packaging-list.
Regards,
Mamoru
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Takao Fujiwara wrote, at 08/04/2009 03:49 PM +9:00:
Hi,
I'd like to get the sponsor role of ibus-anthy to commit patches.
Would you give the role?
Thanks,
fujiwara
Perhaps it is better that you would contact Petersen-san
petersen_AT_redhat.com
Regards,
Mamoru
--
fedora-devel-list
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote, at 08/01/2009 12:46 AM +9:00:
JLT == Jason L Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
JLT So useradd must have changed its behavior quite recently.
It could be shadow-4.1.4.1-sysacc.patch, I guess, but that was built in
rawhide on the 16th of this month and I've done
Jan Safranek wrote, at 07/30/2009 05:39 PM +9:00:
On 07/30/2009 01:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html
jsafrane (1):
OpenIPMI
It seems to me your script just forgot to build the package - it
correctly bumped release number, but I can't
Hello:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote, at 07/26/2009 07:42 PM +9:00:
Author: kanarip
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rubygem-rails/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28785/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore import.log rubygem-rails.spec sources
Log Message:
2.3.3-1
snip
Index:
%{fontdir_ttf_v_full}
-%_font_pkg -n -n%{_space}%{fontdir_ttf_v} mona-%{real_family_ttf_v}.ttf
+%_font_pkg mona-%{real_family_ttf_v}.ttf
%doc ttfsrc/README-ttf.txt
%changelog
+* Fri Jul 24 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 2.90-9
+- Adjust for fontpackages 1.22
+
* Fri Mar 27 2009
Braden McDaniel wrote, at 07/23/2009 03:38 PM +9:00:
Is this as it should be?
Dependencies Resolved
Package Arch Version
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11087
Added Files:
noautobuild
Log Message:
Need fixing
--- NEW FILE noautobuild ---
Need fixing
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Frank Murphy wrote, at 07/15/2009 02:35 AM +9:00:
I don't know ruby.
But:
http://tinyurl.com/9m4wzr
is some ruby stuff to identify snippets of Code.
Any ruby knowing people willing to package it?
Regards,
Frank
It would be appreciated if you would add the request on here [1]
so that we
Christoph Wickert wrote, at 07/16/2009 07:58 AM +9:00:
Am Mittwoch, den 15.07.2009, 16:22 -0500 schrieb Matt Domsch:
I wonder... My build systems are running F11 using ext4 file system,
while the koji buildsystems will still be using ext3. It seems like
make is getting confused as to
Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 07/15/2009 12:23 AM +9:00:
This question is related to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505589
When I remove the strip line, then the build process fails with the
complaint:
Found
Peter Robinson wrote, at 07/07/2009 03:26 PM +9:00:
Hi All,
Is there currently an issue with the koji repo process? A pair of
rawhide chain builds that I ran last night failed and when I tried
them again this morning the previous package still wasn't in the repo
to build against. Similarly a
Hello:
It seems that on koji newrepo tasks are all freezing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444680
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444681
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444815
Would someone investigate what is occuring?
Regards,
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/01/2009 04:29 PM +9:00:
Hello:
It seems that on koji newrepo tasks are all freezing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444680
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444681
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444815
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/15/2009 03:52 AM +9:00:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/472622
Reported in Nov 2008.
Is it really that difficult to fix it?
Well, actually these two packages are _the same_ (currently
versions of rpms on Fedora are different,
Paul Howarth wrote, at 06/08/2009 06:08 PM +9:00:
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398761
...
Transaction Check Error:
DEBUG util.py:256:file /lib64/libblkid.so.1 conflicts between
attempted installs of e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.6-1.fc12.x86_64 and
Karel Zak wrote, at 06/08/2009 06:37 PM +9:00:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:08:23AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398761
...
Transaction Check Error:
DEBUG util.py:256:file /lib64/libblkid.so.1 conflicts between
attempted installs
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/25/2009 05:35 PM +9:00:
Are they related to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller
?
Yes.
audacity = 1.3.7-0.6.beta.fc11
Build Time 2009-03-02 16:40:30 GMT
mimehandler(application/ogg)
mimehandler(application/x-audacity-project)
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8040
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
* Fri Mar 27 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 2.90-8
- F-11: Again rebuild for new virtual font Provides (bug
}
Version: 2.90
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
Summary: Japanese font for text arts
# monafont itself is under public domain
@@ -222,6 +222,9 @@
%doc ttfsrc/README-ttf.txt
%changelog
+* Tue Feb 24 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 2.90-7
+- F-11
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28955
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
* Thu Feb 19 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 2.90.6
- F-11: font naming scheme change
Now mona-{bitmap
+25,7 @@
Name: %{archivename}
Version: 2.90
-Release: 5%{?dist}.1
+Release: 5%{?dist}.2
Summary: Japanese font for text arts
# monafont itself is under public domain
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@
%changelog
+* Fri Dec 5 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13205/F-10
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild on devel for new VLGothic, and cleanups
Index: monafont.spec
is under public domain
@@ -241,6 +231,9 @@
%changelog
+* Wed Dec 3 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+- rebuild for new VLGothic
+
* Tue Sep 9 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.90-5
- F-10: Rebuild for new VLGothic
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/F-8
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13205/F-8
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild on devel for new VLGothic, and cleanups
Index: monafont.spec
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13205/F-9
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild on devel for new VLGothic, and cleanups
Index: monafont.spec
Author: mtasaka
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/monafont/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10871
Modified Files:
monafont.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Nov 24 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- F-10: Rebuild for new VLGothic
Index: monafont.spec
: Japanese font for text arts
# monafont itself is under public domain
@@ -241,6 +241,9 @@
%changelog
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+- Rebuild against new VLGothic
+
* Tue Aug 5 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.90-4
- Bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
: Japanese font for text arts
# monafont itself is under public domain
@@ -241,6 +241,9 @@
%changelog
+* Fri Nov 14 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+- Rebuild against new VLGothic
+
* Tue Aug 5 2008 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.90-4
- Bump
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http
41 matches
Mail list logo
