Today we completed the 6 town halls for the Fedora Project Board,
FESCo, and FAmSCo elections. If you weren't able to attend these you
can access logs from each meeting from the main election page on the
wiki.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections
I'd like to thank all the candidates who chose
Town hall meetings have now been scheduled for the Fedora Project
Board and FESCo.
The first Board meeting will be on Tuesday, December 1 at 0300 UTC.
Please note that in North America this will be on the evening of
Monday, November 30 at 10:00pm eastern. The second Board meeting will
be
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info wrote:
So the answers are now free for public consumption on this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/F13_Questionnaire
CU
knurd
P.S.: Just to make things clear 6 month early: next time somebody else
has to
It is time to begin the process of nominating candidates for the open
seats in the following bodies:
* Fedora Project Board
* Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee (FAmSCo)
* Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo)
General Election Schedule:
* November 10-16: Nominations
With Fedora 12 just a few days from release it is time to begin the
naming process for the next Fedora release.
Contributors can make suggestions for the name for Fedora 13 by visiting
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_13
and following the instructions.
Remember there
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
It really wasn't my main argument. My main argument was that we need a
default no matter what and that adding 'GNOME' to the label doesn't change
anything
If it doesn't change anything, why can't we
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Paul Woutersp...@xelerance.com wrote:
That said, I agree the wheel group should be enabled with sudo, though
I disagree that the initial install user should be automatically added
to it.
Should sudo be treated in this case any differently than su? I think
wheel
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
Following your logic, OVM should enter fedora collection as well. !!
It really doesn't matter how often you repeat a wrong sentence.
There are different rules that do apply to code and content in
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:16 PM, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Someone should ask the question: does it make sense to have
different rules if they prevent the inclusion of useful content and
allow the inclusion
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Florian Festi ffe...@redhat.com wrote:
inode0 wrote:
To lead the advancement of free and open source software and content
as a collaborative community.
That is the mission statement of what project?
The Fedora Project with is close but not exactly the same
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
We're announcing a Fedora Activity day coming up very very soon
(apologies for the short notice). This activity day is for maintainers,
QA, and release engineering folks to meet and discuss ongoing issues
with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
