On Tuesday 17 November 2009 08:54:38 Jindrich Novy wrote:
Do you see anything broken on non-x86_64 arches? I checked the F12 repo and
everything looks sane to me.
You are right, it was a problem on my side.
Jindrich
--
José Abílio
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
The same complain happens on F12 (on a x86_64 no less). :-)
--
José Abílio
--
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
It is now fixed.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:47:16AM +, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
The same complain
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-devel-list
