Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Jochen Schmitt
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:10:59 -0400, you wrote: 238Can libvdpau go in Fedora? As far I understand this package itself is open source but has a dependency to the properitary nVidia video driver which is provides by rpmfusion.org. For this reason I vote agains the inclusion of this package

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 15:39 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:10:59 -0400, you wrote: 238 Can libvdpau go in Fedora? As far I understand this package itself is open source but has a dependency to the properitary nVidia video driver which is provides by rpmfusion.org.

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 08/20/2009 10:10 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: Apologies for the late agenda, I completely blanked out today :(. The following are the topics for tomorrow's meeting at 17:00UTC on #fedora-meeting on freenode: 244 Reconsider Moblin Feature for Fedora 12 238 Can libvdpau go in Fedora? For

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.08.2009 15:57, schrieb Adam Jackson: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 15:39 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:10:59 -0400, you wrote: 238Can libvdpau go in Fedora? As far I understand this package itself is open source but has a

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 15:39 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:10:59 -0400, you wrote: 238  Can libvdpau go in Fedora? As far I understand this package itself is open source but has a dependency to the

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:26 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: - From my point of view. This cases demostrate, that we need a clarification about the requirements which a package has to fullfill for inclusssion into Fedora. I don't disagree, but... Package which are only useable if you have

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.08.2009 17:10, schrieb Adam Jackson: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:26 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote: - From my point of view. This cases demostrate, that we need a clarification about the requirements which a package has to fullfill for

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:51 +0200, drago01 wrote: Well S3 does, but there driver isn't open either. But it proves that non nvidia implementations are possible. S3's driver implements VAAPI, not VDPAU. I already have a package review for libva submitted (mentioned it yesterday). -- Adam

Re: Plan for tomorrow's (20090821) FESCo meeting

2009-08-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:51 +0200, drago01 wrote: Well S3 does, but there driver isn't open either. But it proves that non nvidia implementations are possible. S3's driver implements VAAPI, not VDPAU. I already have a