Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:05 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > >> Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an >> option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need >> build-from-source. > > He explained caref

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 12:05 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Someone stated that 2.2 got the look-and-feel of 1.4 as an > option. Maybe you'd like to try that? Currently would need > build-from-source. He explained carefully that his problem with 2.x is the lack of features that worked well in 1.4;

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Ben Boeckel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: >> Ingvar Hagelund wrote: >>> If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from >>> http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for- fedora-11/ > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote: >>

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-07-20 Thread Chitlesh GOORAH
> Ingvar Hagelund wrote: >> If anyone are interested in the packages, they are available from >> http://ingvar.blog.linpro.no/2009/06/11/amarok-14-for-fedora-11/ On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Greg Trounsonwrote: > Thank you Ingvar.  After using Amarok 2 for a couple of months I'm convinced > i

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-29 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: > Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > >> * Rex Dieter >>> amarok2 supports qtscript (which is why it currently has a dependency on >>> qtscriptbindings) > >> So, it should be possible to access a mounted iPod db in amarok-2.x >> using qtscript? > > I'm unfamiliar with programatic access

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-18 Thread kaboon
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and > the iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools > like libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently, one could use > amarok

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Then that's a HAL bug. HAL is supposed to detect hardware and mount it > automatically (using FUSE if needed, that works just fine with ntfs-3g). It > makes no sense that you have to mount it by hand and it makes even less > sense to expect app

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > Not fake. Real iPods like the iPhone or the iPod Touch. They are mounted > using Fuse mounts, that is sshfs or ifuse. Fuse mounts are not detected > by HAL. Then that's a HAL bug. HAL is supposed to detect hardware and mount it automatically (using FUSE if needed, that wo

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
* Matthew Garrett > > > Yes they are. You'll need an appropriate fdi file to indicate that > > > they're an ipod, though. * Adam Williamson > > To be clear, apps like AmaroK / Rhythmbox would just talk to the > > iPod via libgpod or similar directly. The FUSE method of 'mounting' iPods > > is just

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Greg Trounson
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: * Ingvar Hagelund While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting or fuse mounts, I could use some advice on getting 1.4 to work. All the parts seems to be present, I just can't get them to play together. (...) My small F11 patch for amarok-1.4.10, based on the version

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:12:20AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:07 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Yes they are. You'll need an appropriate fdi file to indicate that > > they're an ipod, though. > > To be clear, apps like AmaroK / Rhythmbox would just talk to the iPo

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:07 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > > * Ingvar Hagelund > >>> But amarok-2.x does not (yet) support non-hardware (that is, not found by > >>> HAL) mounts. > >>> > > > > * Kevin Kofler > >> What would su

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > * Ingvar Hagelund >>> But amarok-2.x does not (yet) support non-hardware (that is, not found by >>> HAL) mounts. >>> > > * Kevin Kofler >> What would such a "non-hardware mount" be? Are you trying to use a partition >> or dire

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-17 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
* Ingvar Hagelund But amarok-2.x does not (yet) support non-hardware (that is, not found by HAL) mounts. * Kevin Kofler What would such a "non-hardware mount" be? Are you trying to use a partition or directory on your computer as a fake iPod? Why Not fake. Real iPods like the iPhone or

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > But amarok-2.x does not (yet) support non-hardware (that is, not found by > HAL) mounts. What would such a "non-hardware mount" be? Are you trying to use a partition or directory on your computer as a fake iPod? Why? Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing lis

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-16 Thread Jud Craft
Thanks for that package. Classic Amarok is pretty awesome. On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > * Ingvar Hagelund >> > > While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting or fuse mounts, >> > > I could use some advice on getting 1.4 to work. All the parts seems >> > > to be

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-16 Thread Rex Dieter
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > * Rex Dieter >> amarok2 supports qtscript (which is why it currently has a dependency on >> qtscriptbindings) > So, it should be possible to access a mounted iPod db in amarok-2.x > using qtscript? I'm unfamiliar with programatic access to ipod db's, but theoretically y

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
* Ingvar Hagelund > > > While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting or fuse mounts, > > > I could use some advice on getting 1.4 to work. All the parts seems > > > to be present, I just can't get them to play together. > (...) > My small F11 patch for amarok-1.4.10, based on the version in e

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
* Rex Dieter > amarok2 supports qtscript (which is why it currently has a dependency on > qtscriptbindings) > So, it should be possible to access a mounted iPod db in amarok-2.x using qtscript? Ingvar -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailm

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Rex Dieter
Ingvar Hagelund wrote: > While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting amarok2 supports qtscript (which is why it currently has a dependency on qtscriptbindings) -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
* Ingvar Hagelund > > While waiting for amarok-2.x to support scripting or fuse mounts, I > could use some advice on getting 1.4 to work. All the parts seems to > be present, I just can't get them to play together. * Frank Murphy > also check out http://www.rockbox.org/ Rockbox is a cool project

Re: Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Frank Murphy
On 15/06/09 19:02, Ingvar Hagelund wrote: As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and the iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools like libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently, one could use amarok as a front end to

Porting amarok-1.4 to F11

2009-06-15 Thread Ingvar Hagelund
As one of many, I'm the semi-happy owner of an Apple iPhone. The iPhone and the iPod Touch's media player db is well supported under Linux, using tools like libgpod, and iFuse or sshfs for access. Until recently, one could use amarok as a front end to sync content. But amarok-2.x does not (yet)