On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 01:33 -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:35 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a badger gmail com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:35 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a badger gmail com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:35 -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to Fedora 12, I've filed ticket#270
(https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/270) for discussion at the next
FESCO meeting.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 12.11.2009 20:56, schrieb James Laska:
preupgrade to F12 is basically not going to work for anyone without
significant manual workarounds, due to insufficient disk space on
/boot. I think we may need to talk to hughsie and/or the desktop
team
2009/11/12 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
preupgrade to F12 is basically not going to work for anyone
without significant manual workarounds, due to insufficient disk
space on /boot. I think we may need to talk to hughsie and/or
the desktop team about removing the
James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:00 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to Fedora 12, I've filed ticket#270
On Thursday 12 November 2009 12:10:13 pm James Laska wrote:
*snip*
So there's 174MB of usable space maximum, and usually 158MB
available.
preupgrade now requires at least 167MB free space on /boot:
F12 installer images: 143MB (8mb larger than F11!)
F12
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Neal Becker wrote:
James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:00 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to Fedora
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:25 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:00 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:10 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:00 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:26 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Is part of the reason the F-12 kernel is so much larger that the
debugging
switch is still flipped on?
That's only true for the older F12 development kernels. The kernels
since 2.6.31.5-94 have had debugging turned off.
--
Jesse
F12 kernel: 18MB (10mb larger than F11!)
Is part of the reason the F-12 kernel is so much larger that the debugging
switch is still flipped on?
F12 initrd (initramfs) is about 15.5MB (x86_64) or 11.3MB (i686).
F11 initrd (initramfs) is about 3.5MB (x86_64) or 3.0MB
On Thursday 12 November 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:26 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Is part of the reason the F-12 kernel is so much larger that the
debugging
switch is still flipped on?
That's only true for the older F12 development kernels. The kernels
since
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:30 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Are the newer non-debug ones still 10MB larger than the F-11 ones
(more than
twice the size)? If yes, why is that? Just wondering.
They are larger, due to using dracut to make the initrds rather than
mkinitrd.
--
Jesse Keating
Once upon a time, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com said:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:10 -0500, James Laska wrote:
preupgrade now requires at least 167MB free space on /boot:
F12 installer images: 143MB (8mb larger than F11!)
F12 kernel: 18MB (10mb larger
- Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
I don't think increasing /boot just because of preupgrade is a viable
solution, as the installer image continues to grow. Is it possible
instead to put the installer image (the real problem) somewhere else,
like /? Why does it need to be in /boot?
On 11/12/2009 10:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:30 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Are the newer non-debug ones still 10MB larger than the F-11 ones
(more than
twice the size)? If yes, why is that? Just wondering.
They are larger, due to using dracut to make the
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:56:42PM -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings folks,
After careful review by Will Woods around recently discovered problems
related to preupgrading to Fedora 12, I've filed ticket#270
(https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/270) for discussion at the next
FESCO
On 11/13/2009 05:05 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 11/12/2009 10:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:30 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Are the newer non-debug ones still 10MB larger than the F-11 ones
(more than
twice the size)? If yes, why is that? Just wondering.
They are
Sorry for breaking thread:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade option.
So I'm a bit confused by what is so hard here. preupgrade starts up,
finds it can't store stage2, and then tells you that you'll need to have
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade option.
So I'm a bit confused by what is so hard here. preupgrade starts up,
finds it can't store stage2, and then tells you that
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
There are definitely workarounds available, but none that meet the
criteria for preupgrade as an effortless upgrade option.
So I'm a bit confused by what is so hard here.
23 matches
Mail list logo
