On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Steve Grubbsgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 02:30:14 am Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
llvm
On Tue, 08.09.09 10:33, Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com)
wrote:
The latest Rawhide llvm build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997
-- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the
Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 07:33:10 am Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
The latest Rawhide llvm build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997
-- which you'd probably have to install manually until it hits the
Rawhide mirrors -- have clang's analyzer packaged. Once it
On Tue, 08.09.09 19:52, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
On Tue, 08.09.09 10:33, Michel Alexandre Salim (michael.silva...@gmail.com)
wrote:
The latest Rawhide llvm build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130997
-- which you'd probably have to
Roland McGrath wrote:
They do not claim to handle C++.
… which means most of my packages are not eligible for being analyzed by it.
:-(
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Steve Grubbsgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Friday 04 September 2009 02:30:14 am Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
Thanks
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Roland McGrath wrote:
They do not claim to handle C++.
… which means most of my packages are not eligible for being analyzed by it.
:-(
Yes, unfortunately the priority is to get C going first and then Obj-C.
--
On Friday 04 September 2009 02:30:14 am Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
llvm is in Fedora. Looking at the build instructions for clang, it seems
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:30:14AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
Recently I've run it on a variety of packages, from coreutils
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:15:40PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
I added a path to the clang bin/ dir, and copied scan-build to my ~/bin
and then ran with 'make defconfig ; scan-build -o clang make bzImage'
Am I missing something obvious ?
It may be that the kernel defines $(CC) to
Dave Jones da...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:30:14AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good.
Recently I've run
On 09/03/2009 11:30 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Quick summary: use this tool:
http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/
If you're not using its scan-build tool, then start. Right now.
Really. It's that good. ...
The software does not understand Fedora gcc/g++ well. Just to get started,
I had to add
They do not claim to handle C++.
They failed to generate the obvious error message upon finding C++ syntax.
--
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
