lör 2009-08-08 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Roberto Ragusa:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
After applying this patch, mplayer does not get stuck, it is just the usual
latency/skips/underruns...
Wrongly pasted the patch. Corrected one follows:
You should find an existing bug report in
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:32 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
After applying this patch, mplayer does not get stuck, it is just the usual
latency/skips/underruns...
Wrongly pasted the patch. Corrected one follows:
This would better be submitted as a bug report (against
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
are there pulseaudio 0.9.15 rpms for F10?
Scratch build here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592160
Also needs udev-extras:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=83558
WARNING: May break more things than it
On Sat, 08.08.09 12:10, Roberto Ragusa (m...@robertoragusa.it) wrote:
Hi all,
are there pulseaudio 0.9.15 rpms for F10?
Nothing in koji, the F11 rpms have no easily solvable dependencies,
even an attempt to rebuild the src.rpm on F10 failed because
it needs libtool-2.2, if I understand
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Upgrading PA like this involves big changes and does not qualify as
either security nor as small other bug fixes.
Well, then you could backport at least the bugfixes. It's pretty bad that
known bugs, even pretty bad ones, are staying unfixed on the still-supported
On 08/08/2009 12:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Upgrading PA like this involves big changes and does not qualify as
either security nor as small other bug fixes.
Well, then you could backport at least the bugfixes. It's pretty bad that
known bugs, even pretty bad
On Sat, 08.08.09 18:56, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Upgrading PA like this involves big changes and does not qualify as
either security nor as small other bug fixes.
Well, then you could backport at least the bugfixes. It's pretty bad that
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 08.08.09 12:10, Roberto Ragusa (m...@robertoragusa.it) wrote:
I am certainly one of those people who think that released
distributions should only receive security fixes and small other bug
fixes.
I am one of those people who think supported distributions
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
After applying this patch, mplayer does not get stuck, it is just the usual
latency/skips/underruns...
Wrongly pasted the patch. Corrected one follows:
diff -urN pulseaudio-0.9.14/src/pulsecore/memblockq.c
pulseaudio-0.9.14-fix440/src/pulsecore/memblockq.c
---
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 01:02:15PM -0400, Mail Lists wrote:
On 08/08/2009 12:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Upgrading PA like this involves big changes and does not qualify as
either security nor as small other bug fixes.
Well, then you could backport at least the
Roberto Ragusa wrote:
are there pulseaudio 0.9.15 rpms for F10?
Scratch build here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592160
Also needs udev-extras:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=83558
WARNING: May break more things than it fixes, YMMV.
Getting that
11 matches
Mail list logo
