Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
lzma-sdk-java is good but on the other hand, lzma's java SDK is called
SevenZip.
That's just its internal name. It's not officially called anything other
than LZMA SDK.
I'd like to remind everyone that unlike perl, tcl/tk, ... ; the word
java doesn't need to take part in
Fernando Nasser wrote:
Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these
fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that
the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is
impossible) if the prefix is not there.
There isn't enough
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible on
tools adn scripts and should be avoided.
Why not lzma-sdk-java lzma-sdk-sharp etc.?
I think that's a problem of those tools/scripts and not of this
To: Development discussions related to Fedora fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 2:17:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: doubt regarding package name
Having subpackages that do not have the SRPM name as a prefix is terrible
on tools adn scripts and should
On Thursday 25 June 2009, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Not all under our control, not all authors still around etc. And these
fails are subtle and sometimes only detected too late. The truth is that
the regexp syntax is almost impossible (actually, I believe it is
impossible) if the prefix is not
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
accordance to packaging guidelines ?
LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html
So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version of that SDK, which
Rakesh Pandit wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521
Will SevenZip be apt name for this. if no? What is most apt name in
accordance to packaging guidelines ?
LZMA SDK http://www.7-zip.org/sdk.html
So what you're packaging exactly is the Java version of that SDK,
