On 12/19/2009 11:03 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/12/15 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org:
On 12/13/2009 06:16 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/12/11 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org:
We should definitely use Debian's key, right? Otherwise some Fedora CLI
libraries would be unnecessarily
2009/12/15 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org:
On 12/13/2009 06:16 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/12/11 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org:
We should definitely use Debian's key, right? Otherwise some Fedora CLI
libraries would be unnecessarily incompatible with Debian, and whoever
else uses
2009/12/11 Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org:
On 11/29/2009 11:29 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/11/29 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee:
Hello,
snip
Comments?
I'm the maintainer for log4net but unfortunately not for nant. I've
finally gotten around to looking at this.
Debian have a
On 11/29/2009 11:29 AM, Christopher Brown wrote:
2009/11/29 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee:
Hello,
snip
Comments?
I'm the maintainer for log4net but unfortunately not for nant. I've
finally gotten around to looking at this.
Debian have a policy[1] of using a standard mono.snk which
Hello,
I'm writing this to fedora-devel list and also cross-posting to
fedora-mono, as the latter seems rather dead but might be useful for
archiving purposes.
I am not very familiar with Mono and .NET technology, so if I get
something wrong, please correct me. I'm also neither nant's nor
The packages that run sn -k from .spec file and thus affected by the
problem are:
mono-sharpcvslib
mono-cecil-flowanalysis
mono-ndoc
mono-nunit22
log4net
--
Kalev
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
2009/11/29 Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee:
Hello,
snip
Comments?
I'm the maintainer for log4net but unfortunately not for nant. I've
finally gotten around to looking at this.
Debian have a policy[1] of using a standard mono.snk which is provided
by a package (I guess we just then
