On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Paul W. Frieldssticks...@gmail.com wrote:
My bet is that either your package set is too big for the created
file system image, or you ran out of space on whatever partition holds
/var/tmp on your system.
Both seems to be ok in this case, having around 27GB of
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create a custom build target for the
rebuild so we can avoid shipping the symlink hacks in rawhide.
The API did not change in a way it would break any sensible user's of
the API, so no
Compose started at Wed Aug 12 06:15:05 UTC 2009
New package usbmuxd
Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone
Removed package cryptix
Removed package cryptix-asn1
Updated Packages:
firstboot-1.108-1.fc12
--
* Tue Aug 11 2009 Chris Lumens
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create a custom build target for the
rebuild so we can avoid shipping the symlink hacks in rawhide.
A few questions:
Why a
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Could you help with the following bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512115
It is a
Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion
`atom != GDK_NONE' failed
error. This seems to be appeared with gtk
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create a custom build target for the
rebuild so we can avoid
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:47 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version
According to bug #517013, %post scripts should not assume that /dev is
available -- so we can't do anything that requires the existence of
/dev/null, /dev/urandom, etc.
Is this a known and expected packaging rule, or is it a bug in the way
that the user is attempting to install the packages?
--
Rawhide Report wrote, at 08/12/2009 07:14 PM +9:00:
Compose started at Wed Aug 12 06:15:05 UTC 2009
Broken deps for i386
--
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, folks, it's that time of year again - Test Day time! The first main
cycle Test Day[1] of the Fedora 12 cycle is happening on Thursday, and
it's all about...NetworkManager.
[1]:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:18 PM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.orgwrote:
According to bug #517013, %post scripts should not assume that /dev is
available -- so we can't do anything that requires the existence of
/dev/null, /dev/urandom, etc.
Is this a known and expected packaging rule, or
Hi.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:32:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote
Sorry, I had no idea somebody else was referring to them. Next time,
kindly tell me if you want to reuse something that I put up with the
explicit warning that it will be removed shortly after the test day
that it was intended
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:18:16PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
According to bug #517013, %post scripts should not assume that /dev is
available -- so we can't do anything that requires the existence of
/dev/null, /dev/urandom, etc.
Is this a known and expected packaging rule, or is it a
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:40 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:32:48 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote
Sorry, I had no idea somebody else was referring to them. Next time,
kindly tell me if you want to reuse something that I put up with the
explicit warning that it will
Hi.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:51:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote
Errr. wouldn't that be tomorrow, technically?
No, my isos were for the Fit and Finish test day that happened
yesterday.
Well, they're referenced on the wiki page regarding the NM test
tomorrow.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:56 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:51:26 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote
Errr. wouldn't that be tomorrow, technically?
No, my isos were for the Fit and Finish test day that happened
yesterday.
Well, they're referenced on the wiki
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, folks, it's that time of year again - Test Day time! The first main
cycle Test Day[1] of the Fedora 12 cycle is happening on Thursday, and
it's all about...NetworkManager.
We've got some fairly specific test cases lined up (on
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany
it is owned by gecko-maint, but since it's now based on Webkit, that
makes no sense, and I see no reason to expect the Gecko
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:35 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 16:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes, folks, it's that time of year again - Test Day time! The first main
cycle Test Day[1] of the Fedora 12 cycle is happening on Thursday, and
it's all about...NetworkManager.
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany
it is owned by gecko-maint, but since it's now based on Webkit, that
I've noticed 4 updates for Fedora 10 recently that lacked any
description, bug-links or any information besides the package version
to explain what they were or what they would do. This is a problem.
The update #s are: 6250, 6409, 7653 and 7838. I posted comments on
their pages at
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany
it is
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's
sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no
longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to
an appropriate person / group.
Wouldn't that be to the current maintainer to say so?
--
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
--
fedora-devel-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 14:35 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
What version of anaconda did you try? I just recently fixed a problem with
askmethod not doing anything. If you booted from a CD or DVD but
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:37 +0200, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
sorry, I meant 'orphaned' in the sense that its listed maintainer is no
longer appropriate - it needs to have the listed maintainer changed to
an appropriate person / group.
Wouldn't that be to the current maintainer to
2009/8/12 Jesse W je...@wefu.org:
What would be a good next step for me to take to help get descriptions added
to these updates (and make sure this happens less often in the future) ?
I've even coded a test patch to bohdi (attached) to warn maintainers
when they are prepping the update without
I think it?s better when openal-soft will come with f12.
The Packager have enough time to rebuild there packages.
But when the packager want to rebuild there packages i will make an
package for f11.
Am 11.08.2009 23:39, schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:18 +0200, LinuxDonald
I think it?s better when openal-soft will come with f12.
The Packager have enough time to rebuild there packages.
But when the packager want to rebuild there packages i will make an
package for f11.
Am 11.08.2009 23:39, schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 23:18 +0200, LinuxDonald
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:06:56PM -0700, Jesse W wrote:
What would be a good next step for me to take to help get descriptions
added to these updates (and make sure this happens less often in the
future) ?
It should fall back to taking the description from the changelog (in
fact, I think
On 08/12/2009 11:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In the course of doing a bug report on Epiphany, it's come up that
Epiphany is effectively orphaned:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/epiphany
it is owned by gecko-maint, but since it's now based on Webkit, that
makes no sense,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:32:29 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck
It doesn't seem to process https sources, only http and ftp. Is that
an oversight?
Yes. ;(
Fixed for the
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:37:40 +0200
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
This was run against Rawhide right?
Yes.
bochecha:BADURL:adonthell-0.3.5.tar.gz:adonthell
Fixed in Rawhide (at least after the freeze is lifted).
When: Friday, 2009-08-14 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Join us Friday for what we hope to be the last blocker bug review
meeting for the Fedora 12 Alpha. On Friday we will review the unresolved
bugs on
Ben Boeckel wrote:
Updates need to be more descriptive than this. Changelog entries
and CVS commits can range from split package to oops, forgot
the patch to attempted before newRepo finished, bump release.
These are useless as update texts. Maintainers should list
things that have changed
On 08/10/2009 09:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
sundaram:BADURL:gnote-0.6.1.tar.bz2:gnote
Built 0.6.2 with the correct url
sundaram:BADURL:pyroom-0.4.1.tar.gz:pyroom
Fixed in cvs. Won't do a rebuild.
Thanks.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
The following topics will be discussed at Friday's FESCo meeting at
17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net:
235 Apcupsd - static linking
241 Fedora Packaging Committee items for ratification
238 Can libvdpau go in Fedora?
236 Proposal to allow translated versions of
Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com writes:
It should fall back to taking the description from the changelog (in
fact, I think it already does that right now).
Where would I find the changelog? It's not visibly connected either to the
description that shows up along with the update, or on
Ping?
This bug is pretty nasty: we have to restart slapd
2 or 3 times a day :-/
El Mon, 10-08-2009 a las 02:08 +0200, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
Hello,
I'm running into a problem with Fedora 11 and OpenLDAP's slapd
On 08/12/2009 11:54 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
If this is enforced (and it may be good to add it to the
critical-path suggestion), updates will be reduced since when
there's little to write about, there's less justification for an
update in the first place.
Correct, such a step will add a
El Thu, 13-08-2009 a las 07:12 +0200, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
Ping?
This bug is pretty nasty: we have to restart slapd
2 or 3 times a day :-/
Ok, I think I'm starting to see the light here, but perhaps
it's just because it's already dawn.
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires
perl(DBIX::Class)
On x86_64:
perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires
perl(DBIX::Class)
On i386:
45 matches
Mail list logo
