-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 01/06/2010 06:34 PM, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> On 01/04/2010 05:29 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> One of the first issues we'll have to face is the use of
>> common-lisp-controller.
>> First, it postpones compilation to the first time the app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2010 04:27 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Alexander Kahl
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the offer; currently I'm busy with getting GNUnet through the
>> review, ccl can be next on the list but I'm unsure whether it wouldn't
2010/1/7 Zing :
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
>> Till Maas wrote:
>>
>>> You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
>>> is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
>>> system wit
hi,
wrt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550976
I've built the sub packages and have put them up here with the spec.
http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/transmission/
Can someone please review these?
Thanks,
regards,
Ankur
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redh
Compose started at Fri Jan 8 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
PyKDE-3.16.6-1.fc13.i686 requires sip-api(6) >= 0:6.0
R-hdf5-1.6.9-5.fc13.i686 requires hdf5 = 0:1.8.3
anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires libevoluti
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
> > is installed. I don't like this. This make it a lot easier to break a
> > system with Rawhide, if on
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 09:28:26AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As I proceed to port our make system over into fedpkg, I've ran across a
> couple targets that are giving me pause.
>
> Is anybody out there making use of the following targets?
> patch
I use this quite often to generate patches, b
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:47:10PM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Jonathan Underwood writes:
>
> > I have used make patch quite a bit when developing patches. I guess
> > it's just a wrapper around gendiff though, so it maybe redundant i.e.
> > in my use case I could have been using gendiff.
>
>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:59:14PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:00 +0100, nodata wrote:
> > I'd like to suggest an enhancement for Fedora 13: nothing should ever
> > steal focus from the window I am typing in. If I am typing in a shell
> > window, or in a word processor, o
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:43 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
> > Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
> > > is installed. I don't like this. Thi
Till Maas writes:
> Would you please provide more instructions about how to implement it and
> how to use it?
quilt has builtin support for spec files. You only need to run "quilt
setup foo.spec".
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, James Antill wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 21:19 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 20:44 +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
Presto is one of the best things ever, but occasionally it ends up not
finding the delta files from any of the mirrors in the mirror l
Hi,
I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can
somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11 branches?
An uptodate srpm successfully build in mock on my laptop (F-12) and in koji --
scratch
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
> As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can
> somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11 branches?
https://fedoraproject.org
On Friday 08 January 2010 15:51:28 Alain Portal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
> As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can
> somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11
> branches?
F-10 branch is EOL
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Alexander Kahl
wrote:
> Please see my reply to David's post; do you know whether there is a
> standardized SIG founding procedure?
I looked around and found this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Defining_projects
It sounds like we should tell the Fedora Project Bo
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:17:02 +0100, Thomas Janssen wrote:
> 2010/1/7 Zing :
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:02:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:24:05 +0100
>>> Till Maas wrote:
>>>
You propose that the repo should be enabled by default if the package
is installed. I
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 16:11:32, Andrea Musuruane a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
> > As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project,
> > can somebody tell me how to upda
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 16:26:14, Jaroslav Reznik a écrit :
> F-10 branch is EOL (you probably thought F-11, F-12), for F-11/F-12
> branches see [1].
Yes, of course ;-)
> Nice to have you back!
Thanks
--
Les pages de manuel Linux en français
http://manpagesfr.free.fr
signature.asc
Desc
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:49 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> wrt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550976
>
> I've built the sub packages and have put them up here with the spec.
>
> http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/transmission/
>
> Can someone please review these?
You should:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:36:59 + (UTC)
Zing wrote:
> What makes you think these same users won't then also edit and enable
> rawhide at this point? It's not much of a stretch to think these
> seemingly innocent users might see this "rawhide" package, install,
> and then also enable it; in fac
2010/1/8 Alain Portal :
> I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan.
> As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can
> somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11 branches?
As it has been updated last more than three months ago, it nee
Full logs at:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-08/fesco.2010-01-08-16.59.html
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-08/fesco.2010-01-08-16.59.txt
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-08/fesco.2010-01-08-16.59.log.html
Meeting started by n
So I know lots of people submit these sort of begs offering to do
reviews in return, but... I'm a wee bit way too tied up to do any
reviews in return right now, so I'm asking for reviewers to look at
these simply because they're awesome packages we want in the distro... :)
rinputd - A server for r
> libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717
>
> I just got the driver for these cards merged into the linux kernel
> staging tree a few days ago. Now we need the device interface library to
> talk to the thing and add support to
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:28:26 +0100, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Is anybody out there making use of the following targets?
I wanted to use this one:
> unused-fedora-patches
but it does not work, it works only for kernel; fix has been ignored:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/tick
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 19:17:48, Thomas Moschny a écrit :
> As it has been updated last more than three months ago, it needs a new
> review, iirc. See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_
> Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
Mamoru Tasaka already told me
> rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705
>
I'm taking this for review, it's just too cool not to...
> Jarod Wilson
> ja...@redhat.com
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.re
Till Maas wrote:
> I would like to have this with a slight modificiation. If a package
> FTBFS for at least a certain amount of time (e.g. two weeks) at the time
> of Beta, then every provenpackager may just fix the bugs for another
> certain amount of time (e.g. another two weeks) and if nobody fi
Jens Petersen wrote:
> In F12 we shipped yum-presto in @gnome-desktop - a kind of a compromise I
> guess. Presto/deltarpm is very useful for machines with low net
> connectivity to mirrors but enough resources to rebuild rpms.
>
> But yum-presto is not a desktop package at all and certainly does n
Jerry James wrote:
> One of the first issues we'll have to face is the use of
> common-lisp-controller.
Ouch, we weren't aware of all these issues when we approved common-lisp-
controller in FESCo. :-( It was "sold" to us as something great and working
perfectly. I wasn't aware that it didn't act
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ouch, we weren't aware of all these issues when we approved common-lisp-
> controller in FESCo. :-( It was "sold" to us as something great and working
> perfectly. I wasn't aware that it didn't actually work at all at this time
> and I strongly
Please do so. Entirely too many general users click-enable rawhide and
never even see the comments in the .repo file at all. They are never
presented a warning or anything of the sort.
Split it into an optional package, and anyone that understands what it is
will easily be able to install.
-d
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:54:14AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> >
> >For the impatient:
> >
> >Starting with today's rawhide, the these kind of constructs in
> >specs no longer "work":
> > %{?!foo: %define foo bar}
> >For the generally desired
On 09/01/10 00:32, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Fri Jan 8 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
...
>ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0:6.10.4
>ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires ghc = 0
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 13:06 +1100, David Timms wrote:
> On 09/01/10 00:32, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Fri Jan 8 08:15:04 UTC 2010
> >
> > Broken deps for i386
> > --
> ...
> >ghc-HTTP-devel-4000.0.6-6.fc13.i686 requires
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:42:06 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jens Petersen wrote:
> > In F12 we shipped yum-presto in @gnome-desktop - a kind of a
> > compromise I guess. Presto/deltarpm is very useful for machines
> > with low net connectivity to mirrors but enough resources to
> > rebuild rpms.
> >
Kevin Kofler:
> Ouch, we weren't aware of all these issues when we approved common-lisp-
> controller in FESCo. :-( It was "sold" to us as something great and working
> perfectly. I wasn't aware that it didn't actually work at all at this time
> and I strongly doubt the rest of FESCo was either.
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Outage Notification - 2010-01-09 02:00 UTC
>
> There will be an outage starting at 2010-01-09 02:00 UTC, which will last
> approximately 3 hours.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastr
39 matches
Mail list logo
