Hi fellow packagers,
is anybody interested in maintaining vpnc in Fedora and EPEL? I'd like
to orphan it. I might stay as a comaintainer if you want.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:06 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 05:29:32PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
On 05/25/2009 05:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
is anybody interested in maintaining vpnc in Fedora
/not
dropping split CDs install media and we want to drop support for
processors without SSE2? Please no.
Moving from the current i586 to pure i686 would not be so painful but I
suppose it would not bring much benefit in terms of performance gain.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've
in F11 already without the intermediate ~i586
requirement.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
will be reverted in the next upstream
cronie release due some time during the next week. This change is too
confusing to users.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora
in the upstream 1.0.0 branch. I was unfortunately not
able to complete this porting before Alpha Freeze.
As always I will rebuild all the dependent packages if you do not ask me
otherwise for your package.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version just after the F12
Alpha release. I asked rel-eng to create a custom build target for the
rebuild so we can avoid
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:47 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:45:50AM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to upgrade OpenSSL to 1.0.0-beta3 version
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 18:15 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
Rawhide Report wrote:
ctorrent-1.3.4-12.dnh3.3.2.fc12
---
* Fri Aug 21 2009 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com - 1.3.4-11.dnh3.3.2
- rebuilt with new openssl
* Fri Aug 21 2009 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r
rebuilt.
If you have a package which failed a rebuild and want to look at it you
can try building it into dist-f12-openssl after patching the API calls.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
won't
do it again.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
to be worth reporting it to bz on anaconda.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
) would contain
known vulnerabilities and so knowing that you have a file that was once
included in Fedora does not guarantee you almost anything.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
--
fedora-devel
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 10:45 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:20:17 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
What would this be good for? Actually for some files it would be a
known bad file hashes because these files (binaries or scripts) would
contain known vulnerabilities
. Certainly something
to discuss. Catching it at bodhi time seems too late.
We could allow adding numbers after the dist tag in release for this
purpose. And if the fixed package would upgrade to a newer upstream
version it should not be too big hassle to build it in the rawhide tree
first.
--
Tomas
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 13:39 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Tomas Mraz wrote:
We could allow adding numbers after the dist tag in release for this
purpose.
That is already allowed, and encouraged, for branch-specific modfications,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines
to the previously focused window.
With the compositing WMs it would be also easily possible to make the
new window semitransparent over the old window so the user would still
see that he is typing into the old window.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back
17 matches
Mail list logo
