On 12/07/09 03:35, David wrote:
Would you please name some very modern day applications that are
written for the windows platform that will run in a Linux current
version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in
Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_ applications. The
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Davidbrusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Davidbrusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank
2009/7/12, David brusefamel...@gmail.com:
Would you please name some very modern day applications that are
written for the windows platform that will run in a Linux current
version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in
Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_ applications.
2009/7/12 Joonas Sarajärvi mue...@gmail.com:
2009/7/12, David brusefamel...@gmail.com:
Would you please name some very modern day applications that are
written for the windows platform that will run in a Linux current
version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in
Fedora
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:35:42PM -0400, David wrote:
Would you please name some very modern day applications that are
written for the windows platform that will run in a Linux current
version of WINE? That will run under the currently available WINE in
Fedora 11. Names and versions. _Real_
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:17:39PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
All of the cross-compiled apps
... by which I mean apps cross-compiled using our libraries,
like mingw32-gtk2.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog:
2009/7/10 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following
x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when
compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits?
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 08:38 +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
2009/7/10 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com:
On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following
x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when
compiling those
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
snip
The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier,
e.g. instead of
# yum install foo
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
snip
The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
the wanted architecture when installing,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/07/09 10:41, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
snip
The x86_64 repo contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
64-bit versions if available. Try
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables are.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 7/11/2009 8:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 20:03:51 -0400,
David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
The 'real guys'. The developers, code writers, people-in-the-know, show
respect where respect is warranted.
I'm sure Al Capone got a lot of respect in his day as well.
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$
executables are.
Kevin Kofler
Winblow$?
You really should
On 7/11/2009 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Jul 11, 2009, at 17:03, David brusefamel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/11/2009 6:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
Doesn't seem to work for wine :)
That's because WINE is only 32-bit, because most Winblow$ executables
are.
On 07/10/2009 05:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
I made a custom x86_64 livecd (f11) and found that the following
x86_64 packages depend on i586 and i686. Is this an error when
compiling those packages or they do need the 32 bits?
mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 needs
glibc.i686
libdrm.i586
17 matches
Mail list logo
