[Fedora-directory-users] Failover and SSL

2007-07-18 Thread Rubin
Hi all! I'm trying to figure out how to handle high availability in combination with ssl. I have ssl working for both clients and server to server connections. The problem is that i would like to give a client only one ip/fqdn for the ldap server, like ldap.example.com and manage

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Performance

2007-07-18 Thread Howard Chu
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:12:57 -0400 From: Vampire D [EMAIL PROTECTED] I heard it from Cisco when working with them on a project as they claims it has a hard time keeping up under a heavy load. In my experience, the Cisco folks don't have a clue what they're talking about. We recently

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Failover and SSL

2007-07-18 Thread Jonathan Barber
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:33:59AM +0200, Rubin wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to figure out how to handle high availability in combination with ssl. I have ssl working for both clients and server to server connections. The problem is that i would like to give a client only one

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Rigler
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 15:29 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hello, fedora-directory-users list; We are working on the setup and clean-up code in the next version: (please see also http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_Setup_Design). I'd like to have your thoughts on the behavior when

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Chris St. Pierre
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Steve Rigler wrote: Personally, I prefer rpm -e to remove only the files that were originally installed by the package. I'll second that. Chris St. Pierre Unix Systems Administrator Nebraska Wesleyan University LOPSA Sysadmin Days:

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Megginson
Chris St. Pierre wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Steve Rigler wrote: Personally, I prefer rpm -e to remove only the files that were originally installed by the package. I'll second that. Ok. The way Fedora DS works with respect to RPM install is a little different than OpenLDAP or other

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Rigler
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote: Chris St. Pierre wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Steve Rigler wrote: Personally, I prefer rpm -e to remove only the files that were originally installed by the package. I'll second that. Ok. The way Fedora DS works with respect

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Rob Crittenden
Steve Rigler wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote: Chris St. Pierre wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Steve Rigler wrote: Personally, I prefer rpm -e to remove only the files that were originally installed by the package. I'll second that. Ok. The way Fedora DS works

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] rpm -e behavior

2007-07-18 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Steve Rigler wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote: Chris St. Pierre wrote: On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Steve Rigler wrote: Personally, I prefer rpm -e to remove only the files that were originally installed by the package. I'll second that.

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] LDAP Server Crashed - Now Read-Only

2007-07-18 Thread Greg Copeland
I finally found it. Sorry. Cheers, Greg Copeland From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Copeland Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 12:09 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject:

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] LDAP Server Crashed - Now Read-Only

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Megginson
Greg Copeland wrote: My LDAP server crashed while I was adding a user. After getting it restarted, the database is now read-only. Where/how do I change the database back to read/write mode? I’ve had to do this once before but it’s been a very long time and I no longer remember where it is

[Fedora-directory-users] Another LDAP crashing question

2007-07-18 Thread Joe Sheehan
Sorry to bother everyone but can anyone tell me where I can get more information on the following error. Thanks Sometimes are ns-slapd process dies. Here is the entry in the /opt/fedora-ds/nodename/logs/errors file [date time] get_ldapmessage_controls failed 12 (Unavailable critical

Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Another LDAP crashing question

2007-07-18 Thread Richard Megginson
Joe Sheehan wrote: Sorry to bother everyone but can anyone tell me where I can get more information on the following error. Thanks Sometimes are ns-slapd process dies. Here is the entry in the /opt/fedora-ds/nodename/logs/errors file [date time] get_ldapmessage_controls failed 12 (Unavailable

[Fedora-directory-users] 64-bit PassSync?

2007-07-18 Thread Josh Kelley
Is a 64-bit version of the Windows PassSync program available anywhere? If not, are there currently any plans to provide a 64-bit version? Thank you. Josh Kelley -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com