Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
04:15:47 EDT ---
You still have a (harmless
Author: sarantis
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6333
Modified Files:
tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec
Log Message:
Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions)
Index: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec
Author: sarantis
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6473
Modified Files:
tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec
Log Message:
Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions)
Index: tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec
Author: sarantis
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-cm-lgc/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv6942
Modified Files:
tetex-font-cm-lgc.spec
Log Message:
- Restructure spec file according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/samyak-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7015
Modified Files:
samyak-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Jan 12 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 1.2.1-2
- bugzilla 477451
- updated spec
Index: samyak-fonts.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461
Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state.
Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Author: sarantis
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/F-9
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14361
Modified Files:
tetex-font-kerkis.spec
Log Message:
Include .afm files (forgotten in the previous versions)
Index: tetex-font-kerkis.spec
Author: sarantis
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/tetex-font-kerkis/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14662
Modified Files:
tetex-font-kerkis.spec
Log Message:
- Restructure spec file according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Ugly appearance of windows and wrong calculation of character width's
by eclipse
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479673
Summary: Ugly appearance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596
--- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-12
08:37:41 EDT ---
Spec URL:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397
--- Comment #14 from Adam Goode a...@spicenitz.org 2009-01-12 08:50:05 EDT
---
Upstream was very fast in responding. They
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477433, which changed state.
Bug 477433 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhb...@n-dimensional.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397
--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
09:15:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298
--- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-01-12 10:26:24 EDT
---
Woo, looks like
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466
--- Comment #3 from Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com
2009-01-12 11:19:49 EDT ---
Updates are in koji now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334
--- Comment #2 from Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com
2009-01-12 11:19:29 EDT ---
Updates are in Koji now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596
--- Comment #3 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-12
13:12:18 EDT ---
Licensing history looks clean, I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-12 14:20:00 EDT ---
yum-3.2.21-2.fc10 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478748
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-01-12 14:27:59 EDT ---
yum-3.2.21-2.fc9 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479596
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
17:04:44 EDT ---
(also you can probably get
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477417, which changed state.
Bug 477417 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2009-01-12 18:07:41
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328799)
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477461, which changed state.
Bug 477461 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477462, which changed state.
Bug 477462 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
18:43:35 EDT ---
Looks ok. Since FPC is still
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
18:50:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Some
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
18:48:29 EDT ---
Some darkgarden QA
You should
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-12
18:56:39 EDT ---
You need to remove the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734
--- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 19:41:55 EDT
---
Have you test on non Firefox (or similar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734
--- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-12 19:56:07 EDT
---
Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447298
Alexei Podtelezhnikov apodt...@ucsd.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-01-13 01:15:57
EDT ---
is this ISCII/ISFOC based fonts?
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-01-13 01:33:02
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=328837)
--
tetex-font-cm-lgc has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts
On x86_64:
tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts
On i386:
tetex-font-cm-lgc-0.5-11.fc11.noarch requires cm-lgc-fonts
tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts =
0:2.0-16.fc11
On x86_64:
tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts =
0:2.0-16.fc11
On i386:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
47 matches
Mail list logo
