[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #3 from Felix ife...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 04:02:50 EDT --- From Comment #1 With the attached font file now it

[Bug 501422] [ta_IN][GPOS] U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2 have error results.

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 501424] [ta_IN][GPOS] U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC1 have error results.

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501424 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 04:22:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) ok, i will work on

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 05:36:09 EDT ---

[Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 523166] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D34 combined with 0D4D and 0D35

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523166 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-21 05:54:54 EDT --- I'll look at it this evening

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 06:06:52 EDT --- felix thanks, sandeep can you put

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 06:18:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361905) --

rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-kannada-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-09-21 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-kannada-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9223 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-kannada-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of

rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-09-21 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11083 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of

rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-telugu-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-09-21 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-telugu-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13791 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-telugu-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4

rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 lohit-tamil-fonts.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2009-09-21 Thread Pravin Satpute
Author: pravins Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-tamil-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13844 Modified Files: .cvsignore lohit-tamil-fonts.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Sep 21 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-1 - upstream release of 2.4.4 -

[Bug 523163] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D24, 0D2B, 0D35 combined with 0D4D and 0D32

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523163 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 524149] [ml_IN] Wrong rendering when 0D31 combined with 0D4D and 200D

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524149 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 524148] [kn_IN] 0CB2+0CBE+0CB2+0CCD is not rendering properly

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524148 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-09-21 08:18:58 EDT --- build lohit-kannada-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12

[Bug 524457] [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be abvm

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 524156] [ml_IN] Size of the below based glyph for 0D2E,0D4D,0D32 must be in proportion to the size of 0D2E

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524156 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-09-22 01:42:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) 2. a

[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-22 01:51:53 EDT --- As I commented in the merge review (and

[Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines

2009-09-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-22 01:55:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) (In