[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287 --- Comment #3 from Giandomenico De Tullio ghi...@email.it 2009-12-15 03:40:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) We don't clear the older versions. It's a legitimate scenario to use a home directory with multiple versions of fontconfig, see deleting the old caches would be problematic. Ok, then remove/comment the (useless) scriptlet lines: # Remove stale caches rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/.cache-2 rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/stamp کریسمس مبارک - (From wikipedia ;) ) :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287 --- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-12-15 07:26:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #1) We don't clear the older versions. It's a legitimate scenario to use a home directory with multiple versions of fontconfig, see deleting the old caches would be problematic. Ok, then remove/comment the (useless) scriptlet lines: # Remove stale caches rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/.cache-2 rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/stamp I did in devel. That was leftover from rawhide a few releases back when the filenames were changed during a development cycle. کریسمس مبارک - (From wikipedia ;) ) :) Thanks :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ghi...@email.it --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-12-14 23:39:07 EDT --- *** Bug 546706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-12-14 23:38:57 EDT --- We don't clear the older versions. It's a legitimate scenario to use a home directory with multiple versions of fontconfig, see deleting the old caches would be problematic. The issue of system caches only affects F12 since we shipped with 2.7.x then updated to 2.8.0. I checked the size of the caches and we are talking about 200k worth of stale caches. Not a huge deal not deleting them IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
