On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 14:20 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
In actual fact, the reason that I had made little headway is that when
you start to look at the problem carefully you start to realize that
it's a bit of a mistake for Fedora to be repackaging the texlive
distribution rather than
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 15:04 +0300, Vasile Gaburici wrote:
I did not have time finish writing all the details below, I'll write
some more tonight, but before this Type 1 bashing gets out of hand,
read the stuff below. If you don't want the gory details, the bottom
line is that the mainstream
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
— We should not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories.
TEX should use system fonts directly.
XeTeX can do that. TeX probably NEVER will because that violates TDS.
If you don't what that means, then don't
2008/7/25 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
— We should not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories.
TEX should use system fonts directly.
XeTeX can do that. TeX probably NEVER will because that
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/25 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I second the idea that TeX ought to be an exception to the guideline
not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories; TeX
predates all other programs in a GNU/Linux
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 20:50 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote:
2008/7/25 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
— We should not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories.
TEX should use system fonts directly.
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 23:18 +0300, Vasile Gaburici wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/25 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I second the idea that TeX ought to be an exception to the guideline
not hide general-purpose fonts in
