SSIA but ... :)
* Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.00-1
- initial packaging
- this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts
in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there
are dozens of them, but probably not under suitable licenses
--
Michal Nowak
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 19:13 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote:
URW's GPL release does not include the font exception additional
permission; indeed, it predates it.
Yes, however, GPL is not incompatible with GPL with font exception.
It doesn't make sense to continue using GPL without the font
My lack of legal brain is confused on this. If URW doesn't change the
license and it remains purely GPL, but the other contributors agree to
re-license their parts as GLP+FontException, then what is there to be
gained by this? Isn't the user bound by most restrictive license in
the package, that
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:22 +0100, Dave Crossland wrote:
2008/7/30 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My lack of legal brain is confused on this. If URW doesn't change the
license and it remains purely GPL, but the other contributors agree to
re-license their parts as GLP+FontException,
2008/7/30 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/7/30 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Isn't the user bound by most restrictive license in
the package, that is pure GPL?
Yes, that is true, but:
A) The package is then distributable
B) The only remaining issue is to sell URW on the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at
the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text
at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545510
pango | general | Ver:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298
Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 15:15 EST
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
Author: petersen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/VLGothic-fonts/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3586
Modified Files:
.cvsignore VLGothic-fonts.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 20080624 release
Index: .cvsignore
13 matches
Mail list logo
