Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582
Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 8 22:03:31 +
2008 ---
Yes, very glad to see this getting worked on. Thanks very much to everyone
helping
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 9 01:19:34 +
2008 ---
Unless I'm mistaken, OOo is using ICU. There's a TeX derivative called XeTeX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317
Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317
--- Comment #13 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-08 22:02:46
EDT ---
There has been an update upstream a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430
Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:59 +0300, Vasile Gaburici wrote:
It looks to me like the GUST fokes did their best, but they're not a
big company, so they ignored some legal aspects. Rather than telling
them they're about to get blacklisted, perhaps a more constructive
approach is in order.
When in
