Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-12-22 02:58:37
EDT ---
There's already the mathml-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477406
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-12-22 02:59:27
EDT ---
+1, understood and agreed.
I wasn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
03:19:26 EDT ---
you never know when a font is
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Bug 70132 depends on bug 458160, which changed state.
Bug 458160 Summary: [PATCH] Can't use .otf fonts via @font-face on Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside %_fontbasedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Summary: RFE: warn on fonts installed outside
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: mkfontscale produces syscalls with EINVAL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477607
Summary: mkfontscale produces syscalls with EINVAL
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2993/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.13
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477055
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
07:31:42 EDT ---
fontpackages-1.13 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407
Ben Laenen bl.b...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476951
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
--- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2008-12-22 09:06:17 EDT
---
Both the policy and the implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
09:10:19 EDT ---
Well, the problem with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2008-12-22
09:23:29 EDT ---
Even though the macro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473
Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477551
--- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2008-12-22 09:43:25 EDT
---
Maybe ask fontconfig developers if they'd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477606
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2008-12-22 11:03:52 EDT ---
In reply to comment #11.
It worked with
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Bug 70132 depends on bug 458160, which changed state.
Bug 458160 Summary: [PATCH] Can't use .otf fonts via @font-face on Windows
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477385, which changed state.
Bug 477385 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385
Matthias Saou matth...@rpmforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org 2008-12-22 17:32:24
EDT ---
Hi
First of all, I'd like to thank you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414
--- Comment #2 from Jameson imntr...@gmail.com 2008-12-22 17:39:56 EDT ---
These are symlinks.
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477414, which changed state.
Bug 477414 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477414
Jameson imntr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041
Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state.
Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
Since there has been no more remarks on the clarified font package
naming rules discussed as part of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes_(2008-11-08)
I've queued the following for approval FPC-side:
[Drat. I *knew* I had forgotten to spam one list]
Hi all,
Since the discussion on font package splitting rules seems to be
exhausted, and since no one stepped up with an obviously better proposal
than mine, I've queued the following FPC-side:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Dear all,
As some of you may know, after more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by FESCO.
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 14:56 +0200, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi Sarantis,
As some of you may know, after more than a month of consultation,
feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved
by
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 15:08 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 14:56 +0200, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi Sarantis,
6. However, for fonts that are bundled in a software package with no
other
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 à 15:53 -0900, Jeff Spaleta a écrit :
One thing, can you look over the fonts included in matplotlib and see
if there are any fonts which are not-duplicates of existing packaged
fonts?
Sure, just post the font names or filenames here or in the bug
(otherwise google
36 matches
Mail list logo
