rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 sil-doulos-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2

2009-01-30 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
Author: roozbeh Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-doulos-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22263/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: import.log sil-doulos-fonts.spec Log Message: * Thu Jan 29 2009 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com -

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 03:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22)

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #17 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 04:09:59 EDT --- If it didn't break some other

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 06:09:46 EDT --- Hmm, so gnome-font-viewer doesn't

[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 06:32:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) 1. if you have

[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #24 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 06:39:58 EDT --- Ok. I have changed the naming. The new

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 06:42:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) I could lower the

[Bug 477383] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477383 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 08:30:29 EDT --- This is a known xorg bug, I

[Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 08:33:08 EDT --- if you follow the documented

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #49 from Baif bai...@hotmail.com 2009-01-30 09:03:43 EDT --- For KDE-LiveCD, the following .fonts.conf works!

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-30 09:21:32 EDT --- For record: # rpm -qf

[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #50 from Baif bai...@hotmail.com 2009-01-30 09:44:04 EDT --- Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this

[Bug 477488] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-30 10:03:01 EDT --- *** Bug 480481 has been marked

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480481, which changed state. Bug 480481 Summary: [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480481] [xplanet] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480481 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483115] Review Request: allgeyer-fonts - Musical Notation True Type Fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483115 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.5, 1.6 xgridfit.spec, 1.7, 1.8

2009-01-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15010/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec Log Message: 1.17 Index: .cvsignore ===

[Bug 483329] New: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 Summary: cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora

[Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-01-30 15:38:03 EDT --- =

[Bug 483327] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Product:

[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 16:30:57 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is

[Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 16:32:10 EDT --- (more accurately the %dir

[Bug 483329] cjkuni-fonts : Unowned directories

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483329 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-30 16:34:44 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is

[Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477337, which changed state. Bug 477337 Summary: gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477335, which changed state. Bug 477335 Summary: doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging

[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Bug 477335 depends on bug 482993, which changed state. Bug 482993 Summary: Renaming review: doulos-fonts to sil-doulos-fonts

[Bug 483363] Review Request: yanone-tagesschrift-fonts - Serif decorative latin TTF font

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483363 Paul Lange pala...@gmx.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-30 23:53:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) Created an

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-31 00:01:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) (In

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-31 01:22:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330518) --

[Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-01-31 02:24:10 EDT --- I just tried on a fresh rawhide install

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your 100% sure the next release will be named 1.1 and not 1.0 again but

Re: Lost in translation: font policy ambiguous regarding localization groups

2009-01-30 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@gmail.com wrote: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 01:23 -0800, Roozbeh Pournader a écrit : and everybody just calls ASCII? Everybody just calls ASCII iso-8859-1 or even plain text in any encoding. ASCII is meaningless as soon as

Re: Packaging questions

2009-01-30 Thread Paul Lange
Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 19:04 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 12:09 -0300, Paul Lange a écrit : OK, changed this. FontForge also says the version is 1.0 should I use this or the release date like now? As the documentation says never use 1.0 unless your