On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 23:13 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Dear packager,
At 20091029T192211Z, while scanning the rawhide repository located at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/x86_64/
I have identified the following problems in your oldstandard-sfd-fonts
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a
list that size normal?
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit :
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a
list that size normal?
Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author
drawed basic latin (=ascii) only, I wouldn't be surprised the list
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit :
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is
a
list that size normal?
Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit :
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is
a
list that size normal?
Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's
author
most need only one or two to complete. 7 of them could be fixed with just two
glyph's, I am sure there are more like that in the list.As I have no artistic
skill what so ever, I'll let the creator know.
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
