Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!

2009-10-31 Thread TK009
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list

Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!

2009-10-31 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit : Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author drawed basic latin (=ascii) only, I wouldn't be surprised the list

Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!

2009-10-31 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit : Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author

Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!

2009-10-31 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit : Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author

Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!

2009-10-31 Thread TK009
most need only one or two to complete. 7 of them could be fixed with just two glyph's, I am sure there are more like that in the list.As I have no artistic skill what so ever, I'll let the creator know. ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list