Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit : Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is a list that size normal? Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author drawed basic latin (=ascii) only, I wouldn't be surprised the list was very long. It means that Tiza could almost be used, but not quite, by a lot of people. This is a shame. Please relay it to the font author -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit :
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is
a
list that size normal?
Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's author
drawed basic latin (=ascii) only, I wouldn't be surprised the list was very
long.
It means that Tiza could almost be used, but not quite, by a lot of people.
This is a shame. Please relay it to the font author
Of course please only relay elements of the form
foo(2) { 1e34 1e35 }
foo(0) means the coverage for foo is complete
foo(big number) means the coverage is incomplete, but you should not bother
upstream with something that needs a large effort (big number glyphs) on their
part.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 11:15, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le Sam 31 octobre 2009 10:57, TK009 a écrit :
Running FC_DEBUG=256 against ns-tiza gives me a list of about 50 scripts. Is
a
list that size normal?
Many latin scripts use ASCII + one or two additional glyphs. If tiza's
author drawed basic latin (=ascii) only, I wouldn't be surprised the list
was very long.
It means that Tiza could almost be used, but not quite, by a lot of people.
This is a shame. Please relay it to the font author
Of course please only relay elements of the form
foo(2) { 1e34 1e35 }
foo(0) means the coverage for foo is complete
foo(big number) means the coverage is incomplete, but you should not bother
upstream with something that needs a large effort (big number glyphs) on their
part.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: Problems detected in the oldstandard-sfd-fonts rawhide package!
most need only one or two to complete. 7 of them could be fixed with just two glyph's, I am sure there are more like that in the list.As I have no artistic skill what so ever, I'll let the creator know. ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
