Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Qianqian Fang


Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

On 07/20/2009 10:03 AM, Qianqian Fang wrote:

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted
or removed.


just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ?

I had tried SFNT TTF/OTF, neither of them works with the current 
fontconfig

(cache file could not be generated).


File a bug?!?!?

behdad


yes, I brought it up on fontconfig's mailing list in 2006, mpsuzuki
posted a patch, but it has never been committed.

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2006-August/002364.html

also, it seemed there were some intrinsic difficulties for fontconfig to 
handle

multi-strike sfnt ttf.

Qianqian





Qianqian




___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 10:03 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit :
 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
  ☛ Mid-term, files in legacy PCF or Type1 formats need to be converted 
  or removed.

 
 just curious, for PCF, what format you plan to convert to ?

Can I just dream bitmap fonts will go away ? Otherwise, it would be
awesome if one of the 2-3 ways to create Opentype bitmap fonts actually
worked
-
 I had tried SFNT TTF/OTF, neither of them works with the current fontconfig
 (cache file could not be generated).

Please open bugs upstream so Behdad can fix support for SFNT bitmap
fonts

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list


Re: Rawhide fonts problem report for 2009-07-20

2009-07-20 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 13:41 -0400, Qianqian Fang a écrit :

 Getting opentype bitmap/sfnt wrapper to work for bitmaps is
 definitely the way to go: it not only saves more than half of
 the space, but also makes rendering a lot faster. The only
 concern is the support to GTK1 applications which reply on the
 legacy X font settings.

Well GTK1 passed in WE_DON'T_CARE land a long time ago. It never even
supported UTF-8 in a satisfactory way, IIRC

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list