On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 09:22 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, David JM Emmettm...@davidjmemmett.co.uk
wrote:
Okays,
As I'm relatively new to this list, I don't really have access to much -
so I'll just fire away...
1) When is F12 deadline - how does
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:30 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Hi,
I am quite frightened to take up this topic again and again lest you
all be bored.
Looking at some other stuff around this topic, I just hit some more
info. Looks like Debian looked at this before, and came up with some
useful
http://wiki.debian.org/Groupware
A few new options here.
Will look into it.
http://obm.org/doku.php
SUN JDK, so may not be doable
http://obm.org/doku.php?id=install_obm_sync_server_from_sources
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
ssh
0x86DD170A
The Fedora Community (and Moksha) efforts have a regular public meeting
at 1400 UTC every Monday. We invite interested parties to participate in
our meeting.
You can join our meeting via Fedora Talk, extension 2001. For more
information about Fedora Talk, see:
http://talk.fedoraproject.org/
Our
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
index d2b6dc9..20a88bd 100644
--- a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
+++ b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
@@ -41,6 +41,7
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 16:41 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
These look good to me, thanks!
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
signature.asc
On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
I welcome any comments
I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting
in bugzilla. It's not clear from the proposal if that's a
manifests/servergroups/secondary.pp|1 +
modules/mod_limitipconn/README | 10 ++
modules/mod_limitipconn/files/limitipconn.conf | 18
++
modules/mod_limitipconn/manifests/init.pp | 12
4 files changed, 41
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Mike McGrathmmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
This will allow us for greater control against abusive clients.
Starting on secondary1 for now which seems to be the biggest problem.
---
manifests/servergroups/secondary.pp | 1 +
id like to make the following changes impact will be minimal
/buildgroups is the only active service on buildsys.pfp.o where plague used to
run. its only needed for mock building using epel targets so the increaded
load will be insignificant. the change will be trasnparent to end users.
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 00:26 +0530, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Groupware
A few new options here.
Will look into it.
http://obm.org/doku.php
SUN JDK, so may not be doable
http://obm.org/doku.php?id=install_obm_sync_server_from_sources
Debian's page says OBM is
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Dennis Gilmoreden...@ausil.us wrote:
id like to make the following changes impact will be minimal
/buildgroups is the only active service on buildsys.pfp.o where plague used to
run. its only needed for mock building using epel targets so the increaded
load
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Dennis Gilmoreden...@ausil.us wrote:
id like to make the following changes impact will be minimal
/buildgroups is the only active service on buildsys.pfp.o where plague used
to
run. its only needed
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 16:44 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Both changes look of little impact from infrastructure side.
Provisional +1 unless a release engineer says OH MY ZOD, didnt you
think about Kryptonite?
I don't know of any release engineering item that relies on buildsys.
--
Hey, we had a @fedoraproject.org mail outage today because Red Hat's MXs
changed IPs. Previously, we had our MXs set to
mx[123].fedoraproject.org, which pointed to the IPs of the MXes. With
the last change, we switched to setting the MXs directly to
mx[12].redhat.com, which should always point
I missed a few files in my earlier change request.
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
index 20a88bd..f613182 100644
--- a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 06:19:06 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 16:44 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Both changes look of little impact from infrastructure side.
Provisional +1 unless a release engineer says OH MY ZOD, didnt you
think about Kryptonite?
I don't know
On 08/19/2009 04:41 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
I missed a few files in my earlier change request.
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
index
On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
I welcome any comments
I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting
in bugzilla. It's not clear from the proposal if that's a
A data corruption bug was found in the current xz package for certain
files. The xz package was updated to a snapshot in Fedora and EPEL.
We'd like to update the builders with the new xz to make sure we aren't
producing packages with corrupted payloads.
The corruption bug report is here:
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 08:36:21 pm Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
A data corruption bug was found in the current xz package for certain
files. The xz package was updated to a snapshot in Fedora and EPEL.
We'd like to update the builders with the new xz to make sure we aren't
producing packages
On Aug 19, 2009, at 18:36, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
A data corruption bug was found in the current xz package for certain
files. The xz package was updated to a snapshot in Fedora and EPEL.
We'd like to update the builders with the new xz to make sure we
aren't
producing
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
A data corruption bug was found in the current xz package for certain
files. The xz package was updated to a snapshot in Fedora and EPEL.
We'd like to update the builders with the new xz to make sure we aren't
producing packages with corrupted
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
I missed a few files in my earlier change request.
---
modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp b/modules/sigul/manifests/init.pp
index 20a88bd..f613182
On 08/19/2009 06:29 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
Got the outline of my proposal here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla
I welcome any comments
I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting
in bugzilla. It's
On 08/19/2009 08:09 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/19/2009 07:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
The host xz wouldn't be used to produce any rpms, the rpm inside the
chroot would. Does this come into play when initing the buildroot?
You're right, this wouldn't come into play unless it's a
---
modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp b/modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp
index 686de0a..bac8819 100644
--- a/modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp
+++ b/modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp
@@
---
manifests/nodes/backup1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp |2 +-
.../nodes/proxy1.stg.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp |1 +
.../nodes/sign-bridge1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp|2 +-
.../nodes/sign-vault1.fedora.phx.redhat.com.pp |2 +-
modules/puppet/manifests/init.pp
The page you link is only for the sync server, which doesn't appear to
be mandatory. It provides Funambol, Outlook and Mozilla sync services. I
would think that once OBM's CalDav support is complete you wouldn't
really need the sync server...
Ok. I shall try to get it up today and see.
--
29 matches
Mail list logo
