On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:48 -0600, Michael Yingbull wrote:
We're running it on a regular RHEL machine as well at $dayjob. We've
not seen those problems.
Also using Zenoss on Centos 5.2 for monitoring here at $dayjob. I've
been keeping it on the current version using their native RPM for a
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:03:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Anyone know when zenoss will be in Fedora? It is a requisite of ours.
Even an estimate?
Doesn't look like it is going to be soon looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470
Rahul
If
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:03:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Anyone know when zenoss will be in Fedora? It is a requisite of ours.
Even an estimate?
Doesn't look like it is going to be soon looking at
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 12:45 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 07:03:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Anyone know when zenoss will be in Fedora? It is a requisite of ours.
Even an estimate?
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:51:38PM +1000, Rob K wrote:
Where could OpenNMS fit into this? They've been pretty friendly to us,
and it's a solid bit of gear.
OpenNMS is rock solid, but it's Tomcat/Java powered... would it run
well with OpenJDK?
Yes. Refer
Nigel Jones wrote:
Okay, so while this was intended to be a primary discussion point for
tomorrows Infrastructure meeting we had a little bit of discussion first
in #fedora-admin, and then in #fedora-meeting regarding Zabbix, a tool
like Nagios that I begun to setup for testing this week.
I
brett lentz wrote:
Also, zenoss uses rpath, which makes maintaining it a huge pain.
Just their appliance does. We are using ZenOSS on RHEL (well, CentOS) 5.2.
--
Jonathan Steffan
daMaestro
GPG Fingerprint: 93A2 3E2F DC26 5570 3472 5B16 AD12 6CE7 0D86 AF59
We're running it on a regular RHEL machine as well at $dayjob. We've not
seen those problems.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Jonathan Steffan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
brett lentz wrote:
Also, zenoss uses rpath, which makes maintaining it a huge pain.
Just their appliance does. We are
Okay, so while this was intended to be a primary discussion point for
tomorrows Infrastructure meeting we had a little bit of discussion first
in #fedora-admin, and then in #fedora-meeting regarding Zabbix, a tool
like Nagios that I begun to setup for testing this week.
In summary the
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:59 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Okay, so while this was intended to be a primary discussion point for
tomorrows Infrastructure meeting we had a little bit of discussion first
in #fedora-admin, and then in #fedora-meeting regarding Zabbix, a tool
like Nagios that I
David Lutterkort wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:59 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
Okay, so while this was intended to be a primary discussion point for
tomorrows Infrastructure meeting we had a little bit of discussion first
in #fedora-admin, and then in #fedora-meeting regarding Zabbix, a tool
Where could OpenNMS fit into this? They've been pretty friendly to us,
and it's a solid bit of gear.
--
Rob K http://ningaui.net
I swear, if I collected all seven dragonballs,
I'd bring back Jon Postel. - Raph
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo
