On 21 July 2008, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 19 July 2008, Justin Cappos wrote:
By the way, did you remove the ability for mirror admins to select a
subnet where they'll serve all of the traffic? We're particularly
concerned about this issue in the short term. We took our mirror
down
Hi all,
I've come here before talking about getting a news.fp.o site set up
and running, and we've had a test instance up in the past with Lyceum
but we decided to move in the direction of MU. Bret McMillan has been
working very hard on this over the past several months and has now got
a test
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 21 July 2008, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 19 July 2008, Justin Cappos wrote:
By the way, did you remove the ability for mirror admins to select a
subnet where they'll serve all of the traffic?
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:37 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
AFAIK, this service is still in place and working fine. Though I am a
little confused about the question. It sounds like you'd like to direct
all subnet traffic to a specific mirror. But you're also saying you took
your mirror down.
On 25 July 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 21 July 2008, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 19 July 2008, Justin Cappos wrote:
By the way, did you remove the ability for mirror admins to select a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:37 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
AFAIK, this service is still in place and working fine. Though I am a
little confused about the question. It sounds like
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 10:37 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
AFAIK, this service is still in place and working fine. Though I am a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:46:15PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
Yes, this is a known challenge with subnet delegation in
MirrorManager. We're trusting package signing (and soon, repodata
signing) to prevent rogue mirrors from issuing unsigned data. In
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:46:15PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
Yes, this is a known challenge with subnet delegation in
MirrorManager. We're trusting package signing (and soon, repodata
signing) to prevent
Hi,
So sometime next week I'd like to link to the
publictest10.fedoraproject.org/amber site and ask for feedback. In the
meantime I'm going to install the latest changes on it, and load it up
with all the data from F9. Just a heads-up, and a humble request not
to break things (like the FAS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:46:15PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
Yes, this is a known challenge with subnet delegation in
MirrorManager. We're trusting package signing (and soon, repodata
Fedora 7 definitely behaves differently than Fedora 8 and 9. The
behavior I describe began with F8. For F7 and earlier, the yum policy
would chose any random mirror from the returned list, so having many
mirrors on the list, some of which are unreachable from inside an
organization, would be
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:52:26PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
That's a lot of IPs though. Can I request multiple /16s, or only one?
As many as you like. And recall, such changes are made using your FAS
credentials.
Are these ever checked? Does say a
Josh Bressers wrote:
On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:52:26PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote:
That's a lot of IPs though. Can I request multiple /16s, or only one?
As many as you like. And recall, such changes are made using your FAS
credentials.
Are these ever
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:41 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
3) Always get repo data from fedoraproject.org (probably not practical due
to resource issues)
This is the easiest to implement. It means the small repomd.xml file
always comes from our server. But the rest of the metadata can
15 matches
Mail list logo
