RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread Jarod Wilson
Hey all, Been toying with the idea of splitting the changelog out of the kernel spec itself, to reduce the size of the spec file. Basically, instead of %changelog followed by all the entries, it'd be %include %{SOURCE1}, which is a file 'fedora-kernel-changelog', which carries all the usual

Re: RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:13:26PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: Hey all, Been toying with the idea of splitting the changelog out of the kernel spec itself, to reduce the size of the spec file. Basically, instead of %changelog followed by all the entries, it'd be %include %{SOURCE1},

Re: RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:20:05PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:13:26PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: Hey all, Been toying with the idea of splitting the changelog out of the kernel spec itself, to reduce the size of the spec file. Basically, instead of

Re: RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog as a %doc file, the thought being that not everyone knows to look at 'rpm -q --changelog' output or

Re: RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread Jarod Wilson
John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog as a %doc file, the thought being that not everyone knows to look at 'rpm -q

Re: RFC: split changelog out of spec

2008-08-18 Thread drago01
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:43:49PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Jarod Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We could also, if so desired, install the split-out changelog as a