On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:09:57PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I advocate extreme caution before just willy-nilly building everything
into the kernel. Although this might seem like a great idea from the
point of view of speeding up boot, there is also the pesky issue of
users wanting the choice
linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch
linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch
These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream.
Can they be turned into upstream config options?
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
linux-2.6-net-silence-noisy-printks.patch
linux-2.6-piix3-silence-quirk.patch
linux-2.6-quiet-iommu.patch
linux-2.6-silence-acpi-blacklist.patch
linux-2.6-silence-fbcon-logo.patch
linux-2.6-silence-noise.patch
Fedora local 'hush'
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:47:05AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch
linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch
These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream.
Can they be turned into upstream config options?
They're already runtime settable, so it's
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:59:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:47:05AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch
linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch
These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream.
Can they be
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 13:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:09:57PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
I advocate extreme caution before just willy-nilly building everything
into the kernel. Although this might seem like a great idea from the
point of view of speeding up
