On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:50, Jesse Keating wrote:
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-186277
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186277
2006-03-22
-
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-152896
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152896
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-156139
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156139
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-156290
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156290
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-170411
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170411
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-183571-1
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183571
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-184074
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184074
2006-03-15
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-184098
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184098
2006-03-15
-
Name
These packages were updated to fix an incorrect patch that caused
instability under heavy load.
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-2
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-173091-1
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173091
2006-03-01
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-173091-2
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173091
2006-03-01
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-168516
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168516
2006-02-26
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-175404
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175404
2006-02-26
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-175818
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175818
2006-02-26
-
Name
On 2/20/06, Marc Deslauriers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-4
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157459
2006-02-20
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-173274
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173274
2006-02-23
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-174479
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174479
2006-02-23
-
Name
repo files seem to be correct, as I've gotten openssh, httpd, and
mod_ssl updates recently.
Am I missing something?
--
Henry
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
the updates channel, not updates-testing?
Nils
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
have?
--
Henry
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
consider trying the testing-updates.
Also confirmations (works) for testing-updates are recommended.
However, note that reporting works can only be true for software you
actually use ... not just installs fine :-)
Regards,
Stefan
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https
Breunese.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:58:41PM -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-176751
fedora/3/updates-testing/i386/gpdf-2.8.2-7.2.1.legacy.i386.rpm
At least this package
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 09:57 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:58:41PM -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-176751
fedora/3/updates
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-1
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157459
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-2
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157459
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-3
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157459
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157459-4
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157459
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-176751
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176751
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-178989
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178989
2006-02-20
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-162750
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162750
2006-02-17
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-168264-1
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168264
2006-02-17
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-168264-2
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168264
2006-02-17
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-157366
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157366
2006-02-12
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-181014
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181014
2006-02-12
-
Name
This notification was updated to include x86_64 packages for
Fedora Core 3.
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-175406
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175406
2006-02-11
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-138098
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=138098
2006-02-11
-
Name: nfs
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-168935
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168935
2006-02-10
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-180036-1
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180036
2006-02-11
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-176731
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176731
2006-02-08
-
Name
want to consider switching to yum. Planet CCRMA is also
available through yum and apt for rpm is just a sinking ship really.
Nils.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
, etc). Anything that
prevents mock/yum/plague from being used to build packages for Legacy
will certainly get my attention and some of my time.
Dan
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
to send more details of your problem
maybe I can help.
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Hi folks. Thanks for all the support for FC1,2. Has FC3 now been transferred
to Fedora Legacy? If so, I'll update my apt sources.list. I'd love to take
part in testing packages, but as I've just been working with Linux for just
over 2 years, feel a bit incompetant. ( and I'm sure I've spelt
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-158543
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158543
2006-01-24
-
Name
to be academically correct,
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | I'd be programming in Java.
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I don't, and I'm not.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Jesse Erlbaum on dbi-users
pgpVbeqhZsAPM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:58:50PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Where Fedora Legacy is mentioned, couple it with The Community
Maintenance Project. IE Fedora Legacy, the Community Maintenance
Project.
That makes people associate it with FCX is transferred from the company
supported project
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-177326
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177326
2006-01-19
-
Name
seamless transition
between Fedora Core and Fedora Legacy, lets shoot for it.We need all the
people we can get. If we have to set aside our own preferences and bend
a little to enable this to happen, so be it.
I'm going to step into this discussion with a point that some non-USA
folks here may
suitable name for what this project stands
for but we can listen to the users here. If we do get more community
contributions and users by doing something as simple as expanding on a
name and lowering the barrier to entry by providing seamless transition
between Fedora Core and Fedora Legacy, lets
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-152845
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152845
2006-01-09
-
Name
These were updated to correct an additional vulnerability.
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-166939
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166939
2005-11-24
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-152907
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=152907
2005-11-24
-
Name
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-155510
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155510
2005-11-03
-
Name
, to me this is not hiding at all. But I would be interested to
hear if you have any ideas for implementing your suggestion of making
things easier for people to help.
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
think is too workable.
-Jim P.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
(geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-158801
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158801
2005-10-25
-
Name
list?
If you would look at that list a bit closer you would find the
information above rather quickly.
4) why am I the only one inquiring about this. :-)
Dunno. Others checked before asking?
Michal
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com
human and subject
to errors, but this bug stayed well below the FL radar for many months.
I have a pretty good record of downloading and testing updates, so the
fact that this critical one slipped by alarms me.
-Jim P.
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https
not sure I understand what
you're trying to say here.
Anyway, sorry for the confusion.
-Jeff
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
not sure I understand what you're
trying to say here.
What I am trying to say is this:
I try very hard to contribute what I can to Fedora Legacy. Yet despite
my best efforts I find it amazingly difficult to do anything other than
simply testing released packages. I try to stay on top
, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
, 2005-08-15 at 18:39 +0100, nigel henry wrote:
Just received and email supposedly from Fedora Legacy. It just has
subject Re: And a From address: Fedora-legacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Also has an attachment Garry .cpl. I will
post the email complete with all headers to anyone there who wants
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2005-160202
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160202
2005-08-12
-
Name
: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
Serendipity 16:25:34 up 19 days, 20:58, load average: 0.17, 0.17, 0.16
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list
Legacy Project Subject: Re: Building
| Fedora Legacy 2.4.20-43.7 for RH7.3 from sources.
|
| Am Do, den 04.08.2005 schrieb Frank Hamersley um 16:22:
|
| Can anyone point me to a useful howto on building the
|
| latest Fedora RH73
|
| legacy kernel from source?
|
| Could you be specific about what
101 - 170 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
