Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
Migrating them to what? That's my question.
CentOS 4. Why do you ask?
Nils Breunese.
You seem to think this is a foregone conclusion.
Well, I'm not moving to CentOS. I find the bickering and overbearing
attitude of the moderator of the
Jesse Keating wrote:
Oops, sorry I can fix this, I've just been busy this weekend
While you're at it, the Supported Releases sidebar on fedoralegacy.org
still says:
---snip---
The following releases are currently fully supported by the Fedora
Legacy Project.
* Red Hat Linux 7.3
*
Who can fix this?
Nils Breunese.
Forwarded message:
Eric Rostetter wrote:
I copied the wiki text to the website... I'm not happy with the way
it looks, so I'll try to improve it when I get time, but at least it
is up on the site now...
Can someone also edit
On Sunday 17 December 2006 10:20, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Who can fix this?
Oops, sorry I can fix this, I've just been busy this weekend.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpbU4EQGehYO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
Mike McCarty wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I was just thinking out loud really. I don't expect it is possible
to revive the Legacy Project at this point, but was just thinking
that maybe trying to get companies that build on Fedora (not just
Fedora Legacy) to supply resources
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:36PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Now, let me get started on migrating those last servers running legacy
versions of Fedora Core...
Migrating them to what? That's my question.
If you can't upgrade every year (or ideally, twice year), CentOS
Philip Molter wrote:
If you make that kind of statement, you are effectively removing
high-end server testing from Fedora Core. If FC is still supposed to be
a testbed for the newer software, whether it's desktop or high-end
server, then that sounds like the wrong thing to say.
Well, since
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Philip Molter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:36PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Now, let me get started on migrating those last servers running legacy
versions of Fedora Core...
Migrating them to what? That's my question.
If you can't upgrade
On 12/13/06, Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Philip Molter wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:36PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
Now, let me get started on migrating those last servers running legacy
versions of Fedora Core...
Migrating them
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:56:42PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 11, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several servers on the Internet...
Roozbeh
--
fedora-legacy-list
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 11, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 06:54 -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
I Roozbeh, do you mean more obvious than what is currently on the wiki?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy
Well, yes, we need to make people aware of the situation. There may be
other hosting companies, and even if there are no other
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 11, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several servers on the Internet...
11
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 11, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 07:49, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a
version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems
that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found one 5, but
still no 6.
For a list of
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 07:49, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a
version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems
that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found one 5, but
still
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 10:20, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I agree and we could just end it at that and say we don't care
everybody and their dog is running unpatched systems. But has anyone
ever tried contacting these big companies and explaining the
situation to maybe get some
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
like Plesk. Yes, you're reading that right: Plesk is still supported
on FC1. They don't tell you that FC1 itself has been EOL for some
time now. Note that Plesk is not particularly unique in this...
Totally. This is
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 14:47, Eric Rostetter wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:45, Jesse Keating wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
And once done, I suppose I draft something up for the announce list.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I was just thinking out loud really. I don't expect it is possible to
revive the Legacy Project at this point, but was just thinking that
maybe trying to get companies that build on Fedora (not just Fedora
Legacy) to supply resources might be a good idea. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:45, Jesse Keating wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
And once done, I suppose I draft something up
Quoting Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 14:47, Eric Rostetter wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
I copied the wiki text to the website... I'm not happy with the way
it looks, so I'll try to
On Dec 11, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Axel Thimm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
active and tell the users that we're working on something than
letting
them find out by themselves by being bitten.
That is what I
On Monday 11 December 2006 16:16, Eric Rostetter wrote:
That is what I was proposing. But it seems to have been met by
silence. And I still have no idea myself what is going on.
I was hoping that David would make a comment/decision. Failing that, yes, we
can shut things down. Point to the
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:56:42PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.
where X=2, Y=3,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:52:11PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting David D. Eisenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So what do we need to be saying here? Ideas?
I think we're going a bit fast... Do we really want to wrap up the
project now, or just put it on hold for a while, or wait until we
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.
where X=2, Y=3, and
Quoting David D. Eisenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So what do we need to be saying here? Ideas?
I think we're going a bit fast... Do we really want to wrap up the
project now, or just put it on hold for a while, or wait until we
hear back about the 13 month plan? I'm not sure we have a
So what do we need to be saying here? Ideas?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
31 matches
Mail list logo
