[Fedora-legal-list] content in source tarball

2009-03-06 Thread Christian Krause
Hi, I'm currently maintaining the package anki which is basically a learning program. The original tarball includes a couple of sample files with different licenses (some are not acceptable for Fedora). That's why the tarball gets re-generated without the samples before it gets packaged. In this

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] enabling CUDA support

2009-03-06 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 03/05/2009 07:24 PM, Milos Jakubicek wrote: Now I have a question: as it principally enables the hardware to be controlled by some end-user applications, would it be possible to ship the libcudart.so library in a subpackage as Redistributable, no modification permitted like a firmware?

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] content in source tarball

2009-03-06 Thread Christian Krause
Hello, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 03/06/2009 03:39 AM, Christian Krause wrote: The original tarball includes a couple of sample files with different licenses (some are not acceptable for Fedora). That's why the tarball gets re-generated without the samples before it gets packaged.

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Concerns over SIF OFL

2009-03-06 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Richard Fontana wrote: On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 00:30:52 +0530 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Bruce Perens comments on some loopholes with OFL that allows anyone to use fonts licensed under them as public domain equivalent. Since Fedora has been recommending it over all other font