On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:22:07PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 16:14 -0500 schrieb Paul W. Frields:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:57:10PM +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Hello.
Fedora contains various tools for appliance creation. AFAIK it is
intended
by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the Fedora
wiki, right? If CC0 can coexist peacefully in that role with the new
CC licensing used in both those cases, it does seem like the best
contender.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2009 02:01 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
We need this license to be compatible with inclusion in works produced
by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the Fedora
wiki, right? If CC0 can coexist
are working on a draft for a new and clearer CLA, so if nothing else
this is a point we should be addressing therein.
--
Paul W. Frields (IANAL, TINLA, blah blah blah.)
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://paul.frields.org/ - - http
Also CC'ing the Fedora legal list which is also concerned with issues
like the trademark guidelines.
Paul
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 17:16 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
CC'ing the Fedora Spins SIG mailing list as this concerns most of the
subscribers there as well.
KH KH wrote:
2008/8/26
