On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villal...@tieguy.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W.
On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but
not a RH employee, get?
You, individually? Probably none, although the likelyhood of Microsoft
suing you, individually is very very very very very very low, since you
are giving
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but
not a RH employee, get?
You, individually? Probably none,
Just checking. ;)
although the likelyhood of
On 07/08/2009 03:43 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
Sure, though of course we know they've gone around suing using
companies before, so if I were a company-based contributor to Fedora
(or a mirror) I'd be a bit twitchy.
Then, it would be up to the company to consider joining OIN. You don't
have to
