On 05/13/2009 04:05 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
However, the upstream tarball does not contain a license file. Only
some of the files within the tarball contain license headers. I believe
that every file with a Copyright also contains an MIT license grant.
(There's also an embedded copy of
On 05/13/2009 04:56 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Based on that, it sounds like this is OK for inclusion, and that I was
being overly paranoid. Is this correct?
Yes, although, you should still ask upstream to fix the license
attribution on the files which do not contain it.
~spot
